On Wed, 26 May 1999, J.H.M. Dassen wrote: > Closing them appeals to my sense of tidyness, but keeping them open makes > them available for future maintainers to pick up. > > I'd like to see discussion on whether or not to keep them open. Opinions? We could create a new virtual package named "obsolete", and reassign these bugs to the "obsolete" package. -- "ae9b1696c1fbcef52ec6dd150a4c2081" (a truly random sig)