[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: An Empty `real' virtual package ?



On Sun, 16 May, 1999, Johnie Ingram wrote:
> 
> "Dirk" == Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd@debian.org> writes:
> 
> Dirk> So it was suggest to create an empty ogonkify package (which
> Dirk> would depend on a2ps) to give ogonkify more visibility.
> Dirk> Is this considered to be a good or a bad idea ?
> 
> This seems to go against current practice -- AFAIK its only been done
> once ("xbase"), with Overfiend kicking and screaming the whole way.

And with netscape 4.6, although that is none free.

-- 
I consume, therefore I am

Attachment: pgp8V5NcsDXkQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: