Re: Making sure that policy amendments don't die
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> b) Formally seconded, and a time
> table set for discussion (normally normal bug, titled [AMENDMENT yy/mm/dd]
> 10 days to a month)
How many seconds should this require? 1 or 2?
> Should we keep the rejected proposals around in the BTS in
> state fixed, so that one does not have to redo the old arguments over
> again?
Well it's all mostly archived in the list archives too, if someone brings up
an old issue it can be found there.
--
see shy jo
Reply to: