Re: [was A possible GFDL compromise] documentation eq software ?

To: <debian-legal@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: [was A possible GFDL compromise] documentation eq software ?
From: "Joe Moore" <joemoore@iegrec.org>
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2003 15:17:12 -0400 (EDT)
Message-id: <[🔎] 14901.146.122.45.164.1062184632.squirrel@www.iegrec.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20030829184625.GA29520@quetzlcoatl.dodds.net>
References: <[🔎] 20030829184625.GA29520@quetzlcoatl.dodds.net>

Steve Langasek said:
> On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 04:53:09PM +0200, Mathieu Roy wrote:
>> Including the GPL and the DFSG?
>> Because the DFSG is not DFSG compliant.
>
> "Other organizations may derive from and build on this document. Please
> give credit to the Debian project if you do."
> http://www.debian.org/social_contract

Is that license Debian-specific?  There's permission there only for
non-Debian organizations to derive works.

--Joe

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [was A possible GFDL compromise] documentation eq software ?
  - From: Anthony DeRobertis <asd@suespammers.org>

References:
- Re: [was A possible GFDL compromise] documentation eq software ?
  - From: Steve Langasek <vorlon@netexpress.net>

Prev by Date: Re: Bug#181493: SUN RPC code is DFSG-free
Next by Date: Re: A possible GFDL compromise
Previous by thread: Re: Can I modify the DFSG (and not derive from)?
Next by thread: Re: [was A possible GFDL compromise] documentation eq software ?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread