Re: APSL 2.0: does "complete source code" exclude data?

To: debian-legal@lists.debian.org
Cc: debian-legal@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: APSL 2.0: does "complete source code" exclude data?
From: Mark Rafn <dagon@dagon.net>
Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2003 09:34:01 -0700 (PDT)
Message-id: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.56.0308070928330.26819@hydra.dagon.net>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 1060273198.21798.240.camel@gargantubrain.dartmouth.edu>
References: <[🔎] slrnbj4bpl.2d9.markj+0111@bouncing.localnet> <[🔎] hhsmod3n2w.fsf@theorie.physik.uni-muenchen.de> <[🔎] hhsmod3n2w.fsf@theorie.physik.uni-muenchen.de> <[🔎] 1060249133.1386.51.camel@work.consulting.net.nz> <[🔎] slrnbj4bpl.2d9.markj+0111@bouncing.localnet> <[🔎] 1060306640.1193.40.camel@mozart> <[🔎] slrnbj4o5g.5sa.markj+0111@bouncing.localnet> <[🔎] 1060273198.21798.240.camel@gargantubrain.dartmouth.edu>

I haven't read the license fully yet, so please ignore me if this issue is 
addressed, or there's a phrasing that makes it unimportant.

What, exactly, do you have to distribute to "users" under this clause?  
Does it not have to be the complete service itself?  How does that exclude 
the data and configuration information (e.g. passwords, customer 
information, etc.) that are necessary to actually run the service?
--
Mark Rafn    dagon@dagon.net    <http://www.dagon.net/>

Reply to:

References:
- Re: APSL 2.0
  - From: MJ Ray <markj@cloaked.freeserve.co.uk>
- APSL 2.0
  - From: Jens Schmalzing <jens.schmalzing@physik.uni-muenchen.de>
- Re: APSL 2.0
  - From: Adam Warner <lists@consulting.net.nz>
- Re: APSL 2.0
  - From: Stephen Ryan <taketwoaspirin@deepthought.dartmouth.edu>
- Re: APSL 2.0
  - From: MJ Ray <markj@cloaked.freeserve.co.uk>
- Re: APSL 2.0
  - From: Stephen Ryan <taketwoaspirin@deepthought.dartmouth.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: APSL 2.0
Next by Date: Re: APSL 2.0
Previous by thread: Re: APSL 2.0
Next by thread: Re: APSL 2.0
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread