Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem

To: debian-legal@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
From: Kyle McMartin <kyle@debian.org>
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2003 11:48:00 -0400
Message-id: <[🔎] 20030813154800.GA11725@imladris.debian.net>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20030813071901.GW19561@deadbeast.net>
References: <[🔎] bhbcoe$if$1@sea.gmane.org> <[🔎] 7EA31E62-CD03-11D7-976A-00039317863E@suespammers.org> <[🔎] 20030813071901.GW19561@deadbeast.net>

On Wed, Aug 13, 2003 at 02:19:01AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> All I did was second it.  :)
>
 
And you're certainly not the only person who feels that way...

Regards,
-- 
Kyle McMartin <kyle@debian.org>
0x191FCD8A - 331A 9468 C04D 3A76 5C56  BA68 7EB7 92DF 191F CD8A [DSA]

Attachment: pgp8lngAxzG8y.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to:

References:
- Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
  - From: "Sergey V. Spiridonov" <sena@hurd.homeunix.org>
- Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
  - From: Anthony DeRobertis <asd@suespammers.org>
- Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
  - From: Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Next by Date: RE: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Previous by thread: Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Next by thread: Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread