[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: A possible GFDL compromise



Le ven 29/08/2003 à 20:17, Mathieu Roy a écrit :
> I can do that. It means that I would be about to write a _new text_
> _inspired_ by the DFSG and not editing the DFSG. The DFSG is invariant
> just like the GPL and any other license.

Bullshit. You can make a derived version based on the DFSG, only the
name has to be changed. If the GFDL had such a clause instead of
invariant sections, it would be considered free.

> Too bad, the DFSG still do not meet the DFSG if the GFDL do not meet
> the DFSG.

Wrong.
-- 
 .''`.           Josselin Mouette        /\./\
: :' :           josselin.mouette@ens-lyon.org
`. `'                        joss@debian.org
  `-  Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=


Reply to: