Re: documentation eq software ?
Jeremy Hankins <email@example.com> a tapoté :
> Mathieu Roy <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> > Pointless. I think it's pointless to provide a freedom which already
> > given and cannot be removed.
> Do you think we already have the right to modify invariant text in the
Yes I do.
I can rewrite any idea expressed in any text, invariant or not.
(I cannot rewrite any idea behind a software until I get access to the
sources. If I don't, it's only mimetism.)
> My only point is that the analogy between books (which may or may
> not be free, depending on their license) and works under the GFDL is
> fundamentally flawed.
But apparently you missed the fact that works under the GFDL possibly
can be edited as book.
Not a native english speaker: