Re: Inconsistencies in our approach
Nathanael Nerode said:
> "Adapt it to your needs" is violated by the FDL "Invariant Section"
> requirements. Notably, the 'embedded' and 'reference card' examples
> apply (although RMS espoused a interesting theory involving "multiple
A (IMHO) stronger example would be creating a "How to write Free Software
documentation with Free Software" manual, and using a chapter from the Emacs
The required invariant section of the Emacs manual is no longer secondary to
the combined work, thus the license is inconsistant.