Re: A possible GFDL compromise
O Luns, 25 de Agosto de 2003 ás 16:23:36 +0300, Richard Braakman escribía:
> But to make a new edition with some spelling errors fixed, you
> definitely need the source.
Of course.
> (I'm not sure what you're trying to say here. Are you claiming that
> translations and summaries are all you'll want to do with documentation?)
No, I was just proposing a way to require source code to be distributed in
a free documentation license, which is (IMO) saner than the one currently in
the GFDL.
--
Tarrío
(Compostela)
Reply to: