On Wed, 27 Aug 2003, Steve Langasek wrote: > Note that under US trademark law, no use is so pathetic that it isn't > worth wasting your time on: if you're aware of an infringing use, and > you make no effort to enforce your trademark, this sets a legal > precedent that will come back to haunt you later when someone > infringes in a manner you *do* care about. Exactly. I'm sorry if that wasn't totally clear from the first two paragraphs in my response. [I probably was a bit too circuitous.] If for some reason we don't proceed with a trademark infringment against this website, copyright will be our only recourse against any other site or usage. Don Armstrong -- It seems intuitively obvious to me, which means that it might be wrong -- Chris Torek http://www.donarmstrong.com http://www.anylevel.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu
Attachment:
pgp8pZS4bn3IR.pgp
Description: PGP signature