Re: A possible GFDL compromise
On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 11:54:15PM +0200, Henning Makholm wrote:
> > That doesn't seem to me to be any more non-free than the GPL requiring
> > people that distribute binaries also distribute soures.
> It fails the dissident test. The dissidents would not be able to
> exchange copies of the covered work in encrypted emails (which they
> might have every reason to want to, if the work contains information
> that the secret police does not want people to know).
Hmm, good point. I think I at some point got in my mind what I thought they
were trying to do, and confused it with what they actually do.