Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license?

To: debian-legal@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license?
From: Keith Dunwoody <kstephen@interchange.ubc.ca>
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 11:16:40 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 3F4DC878.1050309@interchange.ubc.ca>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20030828085558.GD9331@mails.so.argh.org>
References: <[🔎] 20030828085558.GD9331@mails.so.argh.org>

Andreas Barth wrote:

Comment: documentation is not software, and DFSG is made with software

in mind.


Actually, the DSFG _was_ made with documentation in mind.

Bruce Perens wrote:
> I intended for the entire contents of that CD to be under the rights stated
> in the DSFG - be they software, documentation, or data.

-- Keith

Reply to:

References:
- Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license?
  - From: Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>

Prev by Date: Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license?
Next by Date: Re: Proposed addition to Debian web pages re: GNU FDL
Previous by thread: Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license?
Next by thread: Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread