Re: A possible GFDL compromise
On Fri, 22 Aug 2003, John Goerzen wrote:
> One of the main sticking points with the GFDL is the use of invariant
> sections
But not the only sticking point, I'm afraid.
> I suggest that even if the GFDL did not allow modification of the invariant
> sections, if it at least allowed removal of them, we would be in much better
> shape.
Vastly better shape. I still believe the other problems with the GFDL
would render it non-free, but at least it wouldn't be as bizarrely
contrary to what I thought the FSF stood for.
> What do people here think about that, and is there any indication if the FSF
> would be amenable to this change?
Aside from one secondhand comment on this list, I've seen no indication
that the FSF is amenable to any discussion of possible changes.
--
Mark Rafn dagon@dagon.net <http://www.dagon.net/>
Reply to: