Re: A possible GFDL compromise
On Fri, 22 Aug 2003, John Goerzen wrote:
> One of the main sticking points with the GFDL is the use of invariant
But not the only sticking point, I'm afraid.
> I suggest that even if the GFDL did not allow modification of the invariant
> sections, if it at least allowed removal of them, we would be in much better
Vastly better shape. I still believe the other problems with the GFDL
would render it non-free, but at least it wouldn't be as bizarrely
contrary to what I thought the FSF stood for.
> What do people here think about that, and is there any indication if the FSF
> would be amenable to this change?
Aside from one secondhand comment on this list, I've seen no indication
that the FSF is amenable to any discussion of possible changes.
Mark Rafn email@example.com <http://www.dagon.net/>