*To*: debian-legal@lists.debian.org*Subject*: Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem*From*: Matthew Garrett <mgarrett@chiark.greenend.org.uk>*Date*: Sun, 17 Aug 2003 02:16:52 +0100*Message-id*: <E19oCA8-0005Ti-00@chiark.greenend.org.uk>*In-reply-to*: <bhcp7l$rbf$1@sea.gmane.org>*References*: <bh6hmf$bdj$1@sea.gmane.org> <20030812030417.GA1679@twcny.rr.com> <bha14d$gvj$1@sea.gmane.org> <1060682254.1132.8.camel@arrakis.ens-lyon.fr> <bhbcoe$if$1@sea.gmane.org> <1060715426.1142.56.camel@arrakis.ens-lyon.fr> <bhbh1n$7ou$1@sea.gmane.org> <1060732005.26001.33.camel@bohr> <1060732005.26001.33.camel@bohr> <bhcp7l$rbf$1@sea.gmane.org>

Sergey V. Spiridonov wrote: >To find the exact value, one should find all possible aspects and sum up >all pros and cons for the majority of people on the long terms. It is >not something you can do in one day, sorry. So, for the GFDL: Allows reuse of sections of document: +100 Requires inclusion of invarient sections, which limits how document may be reused: -100000000000 Overall: negative Gosh. It turns out the weighting appears to be subjective. Fancy that. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59-chiark.mail.debian.legal@srcf.ucam.org

**References**:**Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***From:*"Sergey V. Spiridonov" <sena@hurd.homeunix.org>

**Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***From:*neroden@twcny.rr.com (Nathanael Nerode)

**Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***From:*"Sergey V. Spiridonov" <sena@hurd.homeunix.org>

**Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***From:*Josselin Mouette <josselin.mouette@ens-lyon.org>

**Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***From:*"Sergey V. Spiridonov" <sena@hurd.homeunix.org>

**Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***From:*Josselin Mouette <josselin.mouette@ens-lyon.org>

**Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***From:*"Sergey V. Spiridonov" <sena@hurd.homeunix.org>

**Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***From:*Anthony DeRobertis <asd@suespammers.org>

**Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***From:*"Sergey V. Spiridonov" <sena@hurd.homeunix.org>

- Prev by Date:
**FFII-online-protest against patents** - Next by Date:
**Bug#68256: License problems with TinyMUSH** - Previous by thread:
**Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem** - Next by thread:
**Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem** - Index(es):