Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem

To: Fedor Zuev <Fedor_zuev@mail.ru>
Cc: debian-legal@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
From: MJ Ray <markj@cloaked.freeserve.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2003 16:29:24 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] de49a9660b5a9442bf2049eff0bf5893@bouncing.localnet>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.53F.0308132259360.25382@bearloga.home>

On 2003-08-13 15:26:46 +0100 Fedor Zuev <Fedor_zuev@mail.ru> wrote:

	Articles 69c,69d completely redefine all conception of
exclusive rights (compare with articles 15-23 for "generic"
exclusive rights) - the heart of copyright regime. Hard to imagine
_more_ important changes.

Why do you consider these a replacement for articles 15-23 instead ofa supplement? Have I misunderstood article 69a(4)?

Please note that you do not need to copy me on replies. Indeed, theDebian lists code of conduct says that you should not unless I ask youto.


--
MJR/slef   My Opinion Only and possibly not of any group I know.

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
  - From: Fedor Zuev <fedor@earth.crust.irk.ru>

References:
- Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
  - From: Fedor Zuev <Fedor_zuev@mail.ru>

Prev by Date: Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Next by Date: Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Previous by thread: Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Next by thread: Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread