On Fri, 2003-08-01 at 15:15, Tore Anderson wrote: > * You are permitted to modify the game as you like, and also distribute > such versions under the same license as the original work, if they are > clearly marked as being modified versions. > > ..would that be okay? (Suggestions on how to better phrase this > clause are welcomed.) The GNU GPL version 2 has a clause that words this very well. Is there some reason that upstream isn't using it? The license also doesn't explicitly allow you to do things with the source; you might want to consider adding "in source and/or binary form" everywhere that you mention distributing or modifying the software. -- Joe Wreschnig <piman@debian.org>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part