debian-policy Jun 1999 by subject

[First Page] <
[previous page]
Page 1 of 1 >
[next page]
[Last Page]

[Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]
/etc/environment /usr/local stuff [Was Editor and sensible-editor] /var/state? [ACCEPTED 1999/05/09] Utmp group proposal [forwarded] FHS pre-2.1 draft #2 on web site Re: [Ian Jackson <ian@chiark.greenend.org.uk>] General bug polic [Ian Jackson <ian@chiark.greenend.org.uk>] General bug policy [PROPOSAL DRAFT]: editor and sensible-editor `debian-devel-announce', @debian.org addresses. Better descriptions for non-free packages (Was: weekly policy summary) Bug#22308: closing bug 22308 Bug#22935: PROPOSED] Do not make hardlinks to conffiles Bug#23355: PROPOSED] On closing of bugs Bug#24067: Thoughts on this proposal Bug#24772: OLD PROPOSAL] Mailboxes should have perms 600 Bug#24772: Possible effects on Pine Bug#25882: PROPOSED] u/gid 100 should be statically allocated Bug#27205: OLD PROPOSAL] daemons should not run as root if possible Bug#32448: second Bug#34652: PROPOSAL] Policy is not clear about nawk. Bug#37262: final version of the new logo needed Bug#38212: a couple of (very minor) typographical corrections to my proposal Re: Bug#38523: ipopd: doesn't care about other pop-3 daemons Re: Bug#38612: PROPOSED] Have proposal-submitting guidelines in policy package Re: Bug#38612: PROPOSED] Have proposal-submitting guidelines in policy package Bug#38703: debian-policy: [PROPOSAL] A better way to configure debian systems Bug#38762: [PROPOSAL] Policy should not be governed by GPL Bug#38762: marked as done ([WITHDRAWN/REJECTED] Policy should not be governed by GPL) Bug#38762: PROPOSAL] Policy should not be governed by GPL Bug#38902: [PROPOSED] data section Bug#38902: PROPOSED] data section Re: Bug#39030: bugs.debian.org: heavy problems with potato: loosing mail! Bug#39299: [PROPOSAL] permit/require use of bz2 for source packages Bug#39299: PROPOSAL] permit/require use of bz2 for source packages Bug#39398: debian-policy has an unclear statement on dependancies and priorities Bug#39408: Policy self-reference broken Re: Bug#39463,#39482,#39493: timidity, cdrdao, cdtool has no manpage for something Re: Bug#39463,#39482,#39493: timidity, cdrdao, cdtool has no manpage for something Re: Bug#39830: [PROPOSED]: get rid of undocumented(7) symlinks Bug#39830: debian-policy: [PROPOSED]: get rid of undocumented(7) symlinks Bug#39830: PROPOSED]: get rid of undocumented(7) symlinks Bug#39831: FSSTND refers to an inaccessible file, namely, device-list Bug#40180: packaging manual typo Re: Bug#40282: ae: Improper priority 'required' Can be closed Closing this bug (/etc/aliases not being there, etc. etc). (fwd) Confusion about Libtool archive (*.la) files in -dev' packages Data section Re: dpkg acts strange Editor and sensible-editor FHS's /usr/share/* Re: get rid of undocumented(7) symlinks Re: I'm confused... where do X11 bins go? Idea: /proc/sys/fs/binfmt_misc/register in the policy? ITP: animals (AI learning game) ITP: java-common and friends (Warning: policy problem) Re: Let's Debian blow... gracefully (was: Re: CORRECTION: weekly policy summary) Linking -dev packages with their non dev package Re: Making sure that policy amendments don't die Menu-2.0, optimized menu tree, hints Message subjects Re: More FHS stuff new policy revision non-free suggestions again (was Re: weekly policy summary) RE: non-maintainers seconding proposals (was: Re: weekly policy non-maintainers seconding proposals (was: Re: weekly policy summary) On the disposition of old policy proposals packaging manual/ policy seem to *discourage* pristine source Pre-install required space pre-proposal: get rid of undocumented(7) Pristine source (was: Re: Bug#39299: PROPOSAL]...) Processed: Labelling accepted amendments Processed: Re: Bug#38762: PROPOSAL] Policy should not be governed by GPL Processed: Re: Bug#39299: [PROPOSAL] permit/require use of bz2 for source packages Processed: Retitling old policy bugs Re: PROPOSAL: init file actions (draft 5) Quality Assurance Group mini-policy Re: removing links from main to contrib|non-free (was: weekly policy summary) seconding /etc/init.d/script need not be a conffile if actively maintained Security team and NMUs sensible-editor - let the user decied Re: System integrity... translation dictionaries weekly policy summary Re: weekly policy summary, /etc/rc.boot Why not debian-packaging-doc Re: xlib6g and xfree86-common The last update was on 09:23 GMT Sat May 11. There are 478 messages. Page 1 of 1.

<<
[previous month]
|<
[first page]
<
[previous page]
Page 1 of 1
>
[next page]
>|
[last page]
>>
[next month]

[Thread Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]

Mail converted by MHonArc