debian-policy Jun 1999 by subject
|
[previous page]
|
Page 1 of 1 |
[next page]
|
|
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[Other Debian Lists]
[Debian Home]
/etc/environment
/usr/local stuff [Was Editor and sensible-editor]
/var/state?
[ACCEPTED 1999/05/09] Utmp group proposal
[forwarded] FHS pre-2.1 draft #2 on web site
Re: [Ian Jackson <ian@chiark.greenend.org.uk>] General bug polic
[Ian Jackson <ian@chiark.greenend.org.uk>] General bug policy
[PROPOSAL DRAFT]: editor and sensible-editor
`debian-devel-announce', @debian.org addresses.
Better descriptions for non-free packages (Was: weekly policy summary)
Bug#22308: closing bug 22308
Bug#22935: PROPOSED] Do not make hardlinks to conffiles
Bug#23355: PROPOSED] On closing of bugs
Bug#24067: Thoughts on this proposal
Bug#24772: OLD PROPOSAL] Mailboxes should have perms 600
Bug#24772: Possible effects on Pine
Bug#25882: PROPOSED] u/gid 100 should be statically allocated
Bug#27205: OLD PROPOSAL] daemons should not run as root if possible
Bug#32448: second
Bug#34652: PROPOSAL] Policy is not clear about nawk.
Bug#37262: final version of the new logo needed
Bug#38212: a couple of (very minor) typographical corrections to my proposal
Re: Bug#38523: ipopd: doesn't care about other pop-3 daemons
Re: Bug#38612: PROPOSED] Have proposal-submitting guidelines in policy package
Re: Bug#38612: PROPOSED] Have proposal-submitting guidelines in policy package
Bug#38703: debian-policy: [PROPOSAL] A better way to configure debian systems
Bug#38762: [PROPOSAL] Policy should not be governed by GPL
Bug#38762: marked as done ([WITHDRAWN/REJECTED] Policy should not be governed by GPL)
Bug#38762: PROPOSAL] Policy should not be governed by GPL
Bug#38902: [PROPOSED] data section
Bug#38902: PROPOSED] data section
Re: Bug#39030: bugs.debian.org: heavy problems with potato: loosing mail!
Bug#39299: [PROPOSAL] permit/require use of bz2 for source packages
Bug#39299: PROPOSAL] permit/require use of bz2 for source packages
Bug#39398: debian-policy has an unclear statement on dependancies and priorities
Bug#39408: Policy self-reference broken
Re: Bug#39463,#39482,#39493: timidity, cdrdao, cdtool has no manpage for something
Re: Bug#39463,#39482,#39493: timidity, cdrdao, cdtool has no manpage for something
Re: Bug#39830: [PROPOSED]: get rid of undocumented(7) symlinks
Bug#39830: debian-policy: [PROPOSED]: get rid of undocumented(7) symlinks
Bug#39830: PROPOSED]: get rid of undocumented(7) symlinks
Bug#39831: FSSTND refers to an inaccessible file, namely, device-list
Bug#40180: packaging manual typo
Re: Bug#40282: ae: Improper priority 'required'
Can be closed
Closing this bug (/etc/aliases not being there, etc. etc). (fwd)
Confusion about Libtool archive (*.la) files in -dev' packages
Data section
Re: dpkg acts strange
Editor and sensible-editor
FHS's /usr/share/*
Re: get rid of undocumented(7) symlinks
Re: I'm confused... where do X11 bins go?
Idea: /proc/sys/fs/binfmt_misc/register in the policy?
ITP: animals (AI learning game)
ITP: java-common and friends (Warning: policy problem)
Re: Let's Debian blow... gracefully (was: Re: CORRECTION: weekly policy summary)
Linking -dev packages with their non dev package
Re: Making sure that policy amendments don't die
Menu-2.0, optimized menu tree, hints
Message subjects
Re: More FHS stuff
new policy revision
non-free suggestions again (was Re: weekly policy summary)
RE: non-maintainers seconding proposals (was: Re: weekly policy
non-maintainers seconding proposals (was: Re: weekly policy summary)
On the disposition of old policy proposals
packaging manual/ policy seem to *discourage* pristine source
Pre-install required space
pre-proposal: get rid of undocumented(7)
Pristine source (was: Re: Bug#39299: PROPOSAL]...)
Processed: Labelling accepted amendments
Processed: Re: Bug#38762: PROPOSAL] Policy should not be governed by GPL
Processed: Re: Bug#39299: [PROPOSAL] permit/require use of bz2 for source packages
Processed: Retitling old policy bugs
Re: PROPOSAL: init file actions (draft 5)
Quality Assurance Group mini-policy
Re: removing links from main to contrib|non-free (was: weekly policy summary)
seconding /etc/init.d/script need not be a conffile if actively maintained
Security team and NMUs
sensible-editor - let the user decied
Re: System integrity...
translation dictionaries
weekly policy summary
Re: weekly policy summary, /etc/rc.boot
Why not debian-packaging-doc
Re: xlib6g and xfree86-common
The last update was on 09:23 GMT Sat May 11. There are 478 messages. Page 1 of 1.
[Thread Index]
[Subject Index]
[Author Index]
[Other Debian Lists]
[Debian Home]
Mail converted by MHonArc