Re: Bug#39463,#39482,#39493: timidity, cdrdao, cdtool has no manpage for something
On Tue, 15 Jun 1999, J.H.M. Dassen wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 15, 1999 at 11:54:58 +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > > | If no manual page is available for a particular program, utility or
> > > | function and this is reported as a bug on debian-bugs, a symbolic link
> > > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> >
> > I think this is a stupid policy and should be changed.
>
> Care to provide reasons?
If lack of a manpage is a "problem", what do we gain by making a
symlink to undocumented(7), if it still has to be kept as a "bug"?
On the other hand, if an upstream maintainer does not consider the lack of
manpage as a bug (examples: most GNU packages), does not the Debian
maintainer have the right to agree with the upstream author about it not
being a bug?
--
"b1ee6833581dd5dd33ce109e6147c783" (a truly random sig)
Reply to:
- Prev by Date:
Bug#39398: debian-policy has an unclear statement on dependancies and priorities
- Next by Date:
Re: Bug#39463,#39482,#39493: timidity, cdrdao, cdtool has no manpage for something
- Previous by thread:
Re: Bug#39463,#39482,#39493: timidity, cdrdao, cdtool has no manpage for something
- Next by thread:
Re: Bug#39463,#39482,#39493: timidity, cdrdao, cdtool has no manpage for something
- Index(es):