Bug#39299: PROPOSAL] permit/require use of bz2 for source packages

[Chris Lawrence <cnlawren@olemiss.edu>]

On Jun 10, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>         And, in any case, any solution enterred because we are at a CD
>  boundary is likely to last only a few months at best. 

However, the CD boundary is critical for potato.  And potato will be
released in a few months.

Furthermore, putting spillover source and spillover binaries on the
same disc is a non-starter if we want to preserve the current practice
of making the source CDs non-arch-specific.  I can see contrib and
oldlibs (binary and source) on a CD#3 though, which might let us get
away with a 2 CD upgrade from slink.

So I amend the proposal to drop "require."


Chris
-- 
=============================================================================
|        Chris Lawrence       |  You have a computer.  Do you have Linux?   |
|   <quango@watervalley.net>  |    http://www.linux-m68k.org/index.html     |
|                             |                                             |
|   Grad Student, Pol. Sci.   |     Join the party that opposed the CDA     |
|  University of Mississippi  |             http://www.lp.org/              |
=============================================================================