Re: Making sure that policy amendments don't die
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> writes:
> I have come to realize that there may be a better method of tracking
> the progress of proposals in the BTS.
> a) Pre discussion period, an idea is
> floated, and kicked around and wishlist bug, titled [PROPOSAL]
> polished for a bit
> b) Formally seconded, and a time
> table set for discussion (normally normal bug, titled [AMENDMENT yy/mm/dd]
> 10 days to a month)
> c) End of discussion period.
> i) Consensus: forwarded, titled [ACCEPTED yy/mm/dd]
> ii) Stalled closed, titled [REJECTED]
> d) edited into the policy doc closed
I really like this.
--
.....Adam Di Carlo....adam@onShore.com.....<URL:http://www.onShore.com/>
Reply to: