Re: Bug#39463,#39482,#39493: timidity, cdrdao, cdtool has no manpage for something
On Tue, 15 Jun 1999, Jim Lynch wrote:
> > On Mon, 14 Jun 1999, Roland Rosenfeld wrote:
> >
> > > | 6.1. Manual pages
> > > | -----------------
> > > |
> > > | You must install manual pages in `nroff' source form, in appropriate
> > > | places under `/usr/man'. You should only use sections 1 to 9 (see the
> > > | FSSTND for more details). You must _not_ install a preformatted `cat
> > > | page'.
> > > |
> > > | If no manual page is available for a particular program, utility or
> > > | function and this is reported as a bug on debian-bugs, a symbolic link
> > > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> >
> > I think this is a stupid policy and should be changed.
>
> [...]
>
> Specifically, if man pages are not required, HOW do you propose that a user
> (possibly new) make any sense at all of a binary if it is not documented??
Sorry for the misunderstanding. I was referring to the sentence underlined
by Roland, which means that you can't make a symlink to
undocumented(7) unless there is a bug report.
As far as I know, the symlink makes lintian to be happy.
Could anybody explain why? (Maybe it shouldn't).
Thanks.
--
"999ed1c7bd48215b75195e15d1557559" (a truly random sig)
Reply to:
- Prev by Date:
Re: Bug#39463,#39482,#39493: timidity, cdrdao, cdtool has no manpage for something
- Next by Date:
Re: Confusion about Libtool archive (*.la) files in -dev' packages
- Previous by thread:
Re: Bug#39463,#39482,#39493: timidity, cdrdao, cdtool has no manpage for something
- Next by thread:
Re: Bug#39463,#39482,#39493: timidity, cdrdao, cdtool has no manpage for something
- Index(es):