Brock Rozen wrote: > I didn't see support for pico in this -- thus, I'm against this proposal > until sensible-editor has pico support. (If I'm mistaken,and it does have > pico support, then I will second this proposal). pico is non-free, so I see no reason to hinge a decision on whether something in debian supports something thats non-free. -Jim P.S: sorry that this msg is improperly threadded...