debian-policy Aug 1998 by subject
![[First Page]](/images/first.png) |
[previous page]
|
Page 1 of 1 |
[next page]
|
![[Last Page]](/images/last.png) |
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[Other Debian Lists]
[Debian Home]
/usr/X11R6
/usr/X11R6 process
[Fwd: solution for /etc/X11/window-managers]
Re: [RFC] Exim as standard Debian MTA?
[rms@gnu.org: Free Software Needs Free Documentation]
[srivasta@datasync.com: Re: changes and standards documents]
Before we vote on Policy Proceedures
The best of both release goals
Big changes in the X packages
Bug#25622: dh-make: the copyright template should have an entry for the upstream author (fwd)
CFV: Proposal for updating Debian Policy documents
changes and standards documents
Configuration management
Re: Configuration management, revision 3
Re: Configuration management, revision 4
Configuration management, version 5
contact address for virtual package name list
Correction about origin (was: Re: Shipping the copyright in binary packages
The current policy on xpm/xbm icons
Re: Debian HOWTO
Re: Debian web pages - what needs to be done
Distribution of license documents (fwd)
Final: A mechanism for updating Debian Policy documents
First rest in free doc discussion.
Re: GPL v.3?
Immutable Standards Licenses
license distribution issues (was Re: Manoj, why are you suggesting to infringe the copyright law?)
Licenses for non-software entities
Linux Compatibility Standard (LCS)
Manoj, why are you suggesting to infringe the copyright law?
Maybe it's time to split debian-devel-changes
Re: Next Debian goals
Please help debugging gnupg! (was: Re: Next Debian goals)
Policy on games' high-scores files
Proposal for "Debian Free Document Guidelines" and "verbatim"
A proposal to revive the Policy document
PROPOSAL: A mechanism for updating Debian Policy documents
Revised proposal for updating Debian Policy documents
Second CFV: Proposal for updating Debian Policy documents
Shipping the copyright in binary packages -- and other common files
Start for a discussion about free documentation in Debian.
A summary, if an opinionated one
two minor problems w/ Manoj's proposal
Typo, please read
Vote results for the proposed policy guidelines
Re: What RMS says about standards
What RMS says about standards (was: [rms@gnu.org: Re: Questions regarding free documentation.]
What RMS says about the non-freeness of the GPL [rms@santafe.edu: Re: GPL itself non-free]
Why I don't share Manojs fears.
Why licenses *are* free (was: Re: Why I don't share Manojs fears.
Why licenses can -never- be free.
Re: Why licenses don't need to be free (was: Re: Why licenses *are* free)
Why we must ship at least some licenses (was: Manoj, ...
The last update was on 06:04 GMT Sun May 05. There are 422 messages. Page 1 of 1.
[Thread Index]
[Subject Index]
[Author Index]
[Other Debian Lists]
[Debian Home]
Mail converted by MHonArc
