Re: PROPOSAL: A mechanism for updating Debian Policy documents
Hi,
>>"Santiago" == Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es> writes:
Santiago> I see a little problem here. How and who will decide that an issue is
Santiago> technical or it is not?
The people on the policy list do, possibly with help from the
tech committee? This proposal is about everyday working of the policy
group; anyhitng that raises deep divisions should probably be made
into a Genertal resolution and put to the full developer community.
We should, really, be only doing mostly mundane things in the
policy mailing list; and contentous topics should be more open, and
presented to the full set of developers (after all, the policy group
is a subset of all the Debian develoers, and there is merit to the
argument that all the developers be involved in decisions which are
very significant, or on which the policy group is deeply divided).
manoj
--
It is not just by fine speech or by flower-like beauty that one is
admirable, if one is envious, mean and deceitful, but when that sort
of behaviour has been eliminated, rooted out and destroyed, that
faultless sage is said to be admirable. 262, 263
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@acm.org> <http://www.datasync.com/%7Esrivasta/>
Key C7261095 fingerprint = CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
Reply to: