[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: changes and standards documents



On Tue, Aug 11, 1998 at 08:35:15AM -0400, Buddha Buck wrote:
> > To sum up a bit as I see it: RMS's arguments about technical
> > documentation are sound, imo.  Do the same arguments apply to
> > standards?  If not, what is the difference between technical
> > documentation and a standard.
> 
> I don't think they do, because in a fundamental way, while standards 
> are technical _documents_, I think they are more like personal opinion 
> than program documentation (which is mainly what I see RMS's arguments 
> applying to).

I don't think so. The opinion clause is preserved for politics, emotions
etc. If you argue the way you did, *everything* is opinion, and the way I
write my software is an opinion, too. Let's not stretch this
opinion-exception too far, please.

Thank you,
Marcus

-- 
"Rhubarb is no Egyptian god."        Debian GNU/Linux        finger brinkmd@ 
Marcus Brinkmann                   http://www.debian.org    master.debian.org
Marcus.Brinkmann@ruhr-uni-bochum.de                        for public  PGP Key
http://homepage.ruhr-uni-bochum.de/Marcus.Brinkmann/       PGP Key ID 36E7CD09


Reply to: