Re: Why we must ship at least some licenses (was: Manoj, ...
Phil writes:
> Especially since there is really no possibility of having DFSG free
> license, since any DFSG license would be self-referential and I'm not
> convinced any of the legal profession are going to put up with that sort
> of thing.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |
| The Hasler Public License |
| |
| You may distribute, in whole or in part, modified or verbatim, |
| copies of the program to which this copyright license is |
| attached as long as you do not refer to modified or partial |
| copies by the same name as the original. You may also distribute, |
| in whole or in part, modified or verbatim, copies of this license |
| subject to the same condition. |
| |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
I fail to see any reason why the above license would be either
unenforceable or a bafflement to the legal profession.
--
John Hasler
john@dhh.gt.org (John Hasler)
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, WI
Reply to: