Re: Why licenses don't need to be free (was: Re: Why licenses *are* free)
Hello,
this reply is very short. I'm only adressing the technical points made.
On Sun, Aug 16, 1998 at 04:23:06PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>
> Nope. Not an infringement, if it already is guaranteed to be
> on the system. You have no knowledge of the law, apparently.
We do not only ship complete systems, but also single packages o the ftp
site.
> Rubbish. You do not need to nclude the GPL. It is a courtesy.
This is wrong. Please read the license more carefully, especially point 1.
[which says something about the redistribution of source code] and point 3,
which says that binaries can be distributed under the terms of section 1 and
2.
See also my mail "Why we must ship at least some copyright licenses".
Thank you,
Marcus
>From point 1: "give any other recipients of the Program a copy of this License
along with the Program"
>From point 3: "You may copy and distribute the Program [...] in object code or
executable form under the terms of Sections 1 and 2 above [...]"
--
"Rhubarb is no Egyptian god." Debian GNU/Linux finger brinkmd@
Marcus Brinkmann http://www.debian.org master.debian.org
Marcus.Brinkmann@ruhr-uni-bochum.de for public PGP Key
http://homepage.ruhr-uni-bochum.de/Marcus.Brinkmann/ PGP Key ID 36E7CD09
Reply to: