Re: What RMS says about standards (was: [rms@gnu.org: Re: Questions regarding free documentation.]

[Ian Jackson <ian@chiark.greenend.org.uk>]

Can someone please run by me again why they think we need a new
category `verbatim' or whatever alongside main, contrib, non-free ?

I agree strongly with whoever it was that said that this was just
trying to duck the issue.  Either we are happy with a particular kind
of documentation being more restricted than DFSG-free or we are not.

If we are happy with this then it should go in main.  If we are not
then it should go in non-free.

Ian.