Re: Linux Compatibility Standard (LCS)
Hi,
>>"Jacob" == Jacob Shukert <Jacob.Shukert@MCI.com> writes:
Jacob> Are the other groups who produce Linux distributions involved
Jacob> in defining this standard?
Not that I am aware of, at the moment. However, I am by no
means an authority on this.
Jacob> It appears to me, after reading the description at
Jacob> http://www.debian.org, that only Debian and Red Hat are
Jacob> combining to develop this standard. If this were the case, it
Jacob> doesn't sound right to me.
I think the others have been invited. However, you can lead a
horse to the water, but ...
If this does not sound right to you, maybe you should try ad
convince other distributions to join in. I am sure they would be
welcome.
manoj
--
THE LESSER-KNOWN PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES #17: SARTRE Named after the
late existential philosopher, SARTRE is an extremely unstructured
language. Statements in SARTRE have no purpose; they just are. Thus
SARTRE programs are left to define their own functions. SARTRE
programmers tend to be boring and depressed, and are no fun at
parties.
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@acm.org> <http://www.datasync.com/%7Esrivasta/>
Key C7261095 fingerprint = CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
Reply to: