Re: changes and standards documents

[Raul Miller <rdm@test.legislate.com>]

Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@datasync.com> wrote:
> 	You do this, then it is no longer a standard, it is the
>  documentation of a particular program. 

So?  We're talking about treatement of the document, not treatment
of the specifically named standard.  Otherwise it would be sufficient
to call it something else when dealing with a work derived from the
document.

>  Raul> Anyways, what I'm proposing is that such works should go into
>  Raul> a new section -- one which could be put on cdrom, but whose labeling
>  Raul> indicates that they don't meet the same guidelines as main.  I'm
>  Raul> not sure what to best call it -- perhaps "verbatim".
> 
> 	Yes. Things i main are those that meet the DFSG. Things in
>  verbatim don't, but they still have to meet the requirements of DFDG
>  (no discrimination, freely dostributable, etc, etc)

Good enough.

-- 
Raul