On Sat, Jan 29, 2005 at 02:55:17PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > I believe that most of us have come to the conclusion that self-protection > clauses are free. These are of the form: > "If you make a legal claim stating that use (/distribution/etc.) of this > software infringes a patent, then you may not use (/distribute/etc.) this > software." I'm not sure why you think that (I can't even think of a license with a clause like this in; this isn't even the extremely limited form present in the GPL, "you may not modify/redistribute unless you grant everybody everything they need under any law to do the stuff enumerated in this license, this-is-just-an-observation-not-a-restriction"). -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -><- |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature