On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 10:41:08AM -0500, Dave Harding wrote: > Andrew Suffield wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 12:59:08AM -0700, Joel Aelwyn wrote: > > > Mind you, I don't think I'd necessarily have an issue with "To use > > > this trademark, you must run a publically reviewable bug tracking > > > system and implement some form of version management" (I might > > > still, on a question of practicality, or even a basic question of > > > "Does this make it a required cost of the software, and is that > > > OK?", but it would be a matter of another debate entirely, at that > > > point). > > > > The problem with this sort of clause is usually the same: what the > > hell does it mean? > > Or rather, what does it have to do with Mozilla's requirements? Nothing. Why did you think it did? -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -><- |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature