Re: More mmcache concerns

To: elizabeth@ctyalcove.org
Cc: debian-legal@lists.debian.org, Jonathan Oxer <jon@ivt.com.au>
Subject: Re: More mmcache concerns
From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 23:25:58 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 87r7kyurd5.fsf@deneb.enyo.de>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 4eb66c0105010519571c0bb224@mail.gmail.com> (Elizabeth Fong's message of "Wed, 5 Jan 2005 19:57:12 -0800")
References: <[🔎] 4eb66c0105010519571c0bb224@mail.gmail.com>

* Elizabeth Fong:

> So... I guess the question is, what _can_ we do?

How much code are we talking about?  Perhaps a clean room
reimplementation is the cheapest solution.

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: More mmcache concerns
  - From: Jonathan Oxer <jon@ivt.com.au>

References:
- More mmcache concerns
  - From: Elizabeth Fong <elizabeththegrey@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Hypothetical situation to chew on
Next by Date: Re: More mmcache concerns
Previous by thread: Re: More mmcache concerns
Next by thread: Re: More mmcache concerns
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread