debian-legal Feb 2000 by thread
[
previous month
]
[
first page
]
[previous page]
Page 1 of 1
[next page]
[
last page
]
[
next month
]
[
Date Index
] [
Subject Index
] [
Author Index
] [
Other Debian Lists
] [
Debian Home
]
Re: New OPL Draft
David Lawyer
Re: New OPL Draft
Richard Stallman
Re: New OPL Draft
esr
Re: New OPL Draft
Raul Miller
Re: New OPL Draft
Richard Stallman
Re: New OPL Draft
Branden Robinson
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: New OPL Draft
Branden Robinson
Re: New OPL Draft
Richard Stallman
Re: New OPL Draft
Branden Robinson
Re: New OPL Draft
Richard Stallman
Re: New OPL Draft
Tomasz Wegrzanowski
Re: New OPL Draft
Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
Re: New OPL Draft
Tomasz Wegrzanowski
Re: New OPL Draft
Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
Re: New OPL Draft
Tomasz Wegrzanowski
Re: New OPL Draft
Terry Dawson
Re: KDE not in Debian?
Chris Lawrence
Re: KDE not in Debian?
David Johnson
Re: KDE not in Debian?
Raul Miller
Re: KDE not in Debian?
David Johnson
Re: KDE not in Debian?
Raul Miller
Re: KDE not in Debian?
David Johnson
Re: KDE not in Debian?
Raul Miller
Re: KDE not in Debian?
Marc van Leeuwen
Re: KDE not in Debian?
Raul Miller
Re: KDE not in Debian?
Marc van Leeuwen
Re: KDE not in Debian?
Raul Miller
Vicarious liblity (was: KDE not in Debian?)
Marc van Leeuwen
Re: Vicarious liblity (was: KDE not in Debian?)
Raul Miller
New ways to evade copyright law (was Re: Vicarious liblity (was: KDE not in Debian?))
Raul Miller
Re: New ways to evade copyright law (was Re: Vicarious liblity (was: KDE not in Debian?))
Brian Ristuccia
Re: New ways to evade copyright law (was Re: Vicarious liblity (was: KDE not in Debian?))
Raul Miller
Re: New ways to evade copyright law (was Re: Vicarious liblity (was: KDE not in Debian?))
Marc van Leeuwen
Re: New ways to evade copyright law (was Re: Vicarious liblity (was: KDE not in Debian?))
Raul Miller
Re: New ways to evade copyright law (was Re: Vicarious liblity (was: KDE not in Debian?))
Seth David Schoen
Re: New ways to evade copyright law (was Re: Vicarious liblity (was: KDE not in Debian?))
David Graham
Re: KDE not in Debian?
Marcus Brinkmann
Re: KDE not in Debian?
Marc van Leeuwen
Re: KDE not in Debian?
Marcus Brinkmann
Re: KDE not in Debian?
Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: KDE not in Debian?
Marc van Leeuwen
Re: KDE not in Debian?
Joseph Carter
Re: KDE not in Debian?
David Johnson
Re: KDE not in Debian?
Joseph Carter
Re: KDE not in Debian?
Andreas Pour
Re: KDE not in Debian?
Joseph Carter
Re: KDE not in Debian?
Nick Moffitt
Re: KDE not in Debian?
Andreas Pour
Re: KDE not in Debian?
Raul Miller
Re: KDE not in Debian?
Lynn Winebarger
Re: KDE not in Debian?
Andreas Pour
Re: KDE not in Debian?
Lynn Winebarger
Re: KDE not in Debian?
Andreas Pour
Re: KDE not in Debian?
Lynn Winebarger
Re: KDE not in Debian?
Andreas Pour
Re: KDE not in Debian?
Raul Miller
Re: KDE not in Debian?
Raul Miller
Re: KDE not in Debian?
Andreas Pour
Re: KDE not in Debian?
Raul Miller
Re: KDE not in Debian?
Branden Robinson
Re: KDE not in Debian?
Marc van Leeuwen
Re: KDE not in Debian?
Andreas Pour
Re: KDE not in Debian?
Marc van Leeuwen
Re: KDE not in Debian?
Andreas Pour
Re: KDE not in Debian?
Raul Miller
Re: KDE not in Debian?
Andreas Pour
Re: KDE not in Debian?
Raul Miller
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: KDE not in Debian?
Andreas Jellinghaus
Re: KDE not in Debian?
Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: bibindex should probably be GPLed.
Santiago Vila
Re: bibindex should probably be GPLed.
Rafael Laboissiere
Re: bibindex should probably be GPLed.
Santiago Vila
Re: bibindex should probably be GPLed.
Lynn Winebarger
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: bibindex should probably be GPLed.
Francesco Tapparo
On interpreting licences (was: KDE not in Debian?)
Marc van Leeuwen
Re: On interpreting licences (was: KDE not in Debian?)
David Johnson
Re: On interpreting licences (was: KDE not in Debian?)
Raul Miller
Re: On interpreting licences (was: KDE not in Debian?)
David Johnson
Re: On interpreting licences (was: KDE not in Debian?)
Lynn Winebarger
Re: On interpreting licences (was: KDE not in Debian?)
Marc van Leeuwen
Re: On interpreting licences (was: KDE not in Debian?)
Lynn Winebarger
Re: On interpreting licences (was: KDE not in Debian?)
Joseph Carter
Re: On interpreting licences (was: KDE not in Debian?)
Marc van Leeuwen
Re: On interpreting licences (was: KDE not in Debian?)
Raul Miller
Re: On interpreting licences (was: KDE not in Debian?)
Marc van Leeuwen
Re: On interpreting licences (was: KDE not in Debian?)
Raul Miller
Re: On interpreting licences (was: KDE not in Debian?)
Andreas Pour
Re: On interpreting licences (was: KDE not in Debian?)
Raul Miller
Re: On interpreting licences (was: KDE not in Debian?)
William T Wilson
Re: On interpreting licences (was: KDE not in Debian?)
Raul Miller
Re: On interpreting licences (was: KDE not in Debian?)
Raul Miller
Re: On interpreting licences (was: KDE not in Debian?)
Jeff Teunissen
Re: On interpreting licences (was: KDE not in Debian?)
Andreas Pour
Re: On interpreting licences (was: KDE not in Debian?)
Raul Miller
Re: On interpreting licences (was: KDE not in Debian?)
Andreas Pour
Re: On interpreting licences (was: KDE not in Debian?)
Raul Miller
Re: On interpreting licences (was: KDE not in Debian?)
Andreas Pour
Re: On interpreting licences (was: KDE not in Debian?)
Raul Miller
Re: On interpreting licences (was: KDE not in Debian?)
Andreas Pour
Re: On interpreting licences (was: KDE not in Debian?)
Raul Miller
Re: On interpreting licences (was: KDE not in Debian?)
Andreas Pour
Re: On interpreting licences (was: KDE not in Debian?)
Raul Miller
Re: On interpreting licences (was: KDE not in Debian?)
Raul Miller
Re: On interpreting licences (was: KDE not in Debian?)
Andreas Pour
Re: On interpreting licences (was: KDE not in Debian?)
Joseph Carter
Re: On interpreting licences (was: KDE not in Debian?)
Anthony Towns
Re: On interpreting licences (was: KDE not in Debian?)
Richard Stallman
Re: On interpreting licences (was: KDE not in Debian?)
Zdzislaw A.Kaleta
Re: On interpreting licences (was: KDE not in Debian?)
Marcus Brinkmann
Re: On interpreting licences (was: KDE not in Debian?)
Andreas Pour
Re: On interpreting licences (was: KDE not in Debian?)
Raul Miller
Re: On interpreting licences (was: KDE not in Debian?)
Andreas Pour
Re: On interpreting licences (was: KDE not in Debian?)
Raul Miller
Re: On interpreting licences (was: KDE not in Debian?)
Raul Miller
Re: On interpreting licences (was: KDE not in Debian?)
Chris Lawrence
Re: On interpreting licences (was: KDE not in Debian?)
Joseph Carter
Re: On interpreting licences (was: KDE not in Debian?)
Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
Re: On interpreting licences (was: KDE not in Debian?)
Raul Miller
Re: On interpreting licences (was: KDE not in Debian?)
Joseph Carter
Re: On interpreting licences (was: KDE not in Debian?)
Raul Miller
Re: On interpreting licences (was: KDE not in Debian?)
Joseph Carter
Re: On interpreting licences (was: KDE not in Debian?)
Raul Miller
Re: On interpreting licences (was: KDE not in Debian?)
Marc van Leeuwen
Re: On interpreting licences (was: KDE not in Debian?)
Raul Miller
Re: On interpreting licences (was: KDE not in Debian?)
Marc van Leeuwen
Re: On interpreting licences (was: KDE not in Debian?)
Raul Miller
Re: On interpreting licences (was: KDE not in Debian?)
Marc van Leeuwen
Re: On interpreting licences (was: KDE not in Debian?)
Raul Miller
Re: On interpreting licences (was: KDE not in Debian?)
Marc van Leeuwen
Re: On interpreting licences (was: KDE not in Debian?)
Raul Miller
Re: On interpreting licences (was: KDE not in Debian?)
Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
Re: On interpreting licences (was: KDE not in Debian?)
Raul Miller
Re: On interpreting licences (was: KDE not in Debian?)
Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
Re: On interpreting licences (was: KDE not in Debian?)
Raul Miller
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: On interpreting licences (was: KDE not in Debian?)
Don Sanders
Re: On interpreting licences (was: KDE not in Debian?)
Anthony Towns
Message not available
Re: On interpreting licences (was: KDE not in Debian?)
Anthony Towns
Re: On interpreting licences (was: KDE not in Debian?)
Don Sanders
Re: On interpreting licences (was: KDE not in Debian?)
Raul Miller
Re: On interpreting licences (was: KDE not in Debian?)
Andreas Pour
Why Debian's webpages aren't DFGS-free ?
Tomasz Wegrzanowski
Re: Why Debian's webpages aren't DFGS-free ?
Per Lundberg
Re: Why Debian's webpages aren't DFGS-free ?
Terry Dawson
Re: Why Debian's webpages aren't DFGS-free ?
Per Lundberg
Re: Why Debian's webpages aren't DFGS-free ?
Tomasz Wegrzanowski
Re: Why Debian's webpages aren't DFGS-free ?
Per Lundberg
Re: Why Debian's webpages aren't DFGS-free ?
Terry Dawson
Re: Why Debian's webpages aren't DFGS-free ?
Anthony Towns
Re: Why Debian's webpages aren't DFGS-free ?
Tomasz Wegrzanowski
Re: Why Debian's webpages aren't DFGS-free ?
Brian Ristuccia
Re: Why Debian's webpages aren't DFGS-free ?
Terry Dawson
Re: Why Debian's webpages aren't DFGS-free ?
Joey Hess
Re: Why Debian's webpages aren't DFGS-free ?
Joey Hess
Re: Why Debian's webpages aren't DFGS-free ?
Joey Hess
Re: Why Debian's webpages aren't DFGS-free ?
Tomasz Wegrzanowski
Re: Why Debian's webpages aren't DFGS-free ?
Per Lundberg
Re: Why Debian's webpages aren't DFGS-free ?
Tomasz Wegrzanowski
Re: Why Debian's webpages aren't DFGS-free ?
Joey Hess
Re: Why Debian's webpages aren't DFGS-free ?
Joey Hess
Re: Why Debian's webpages aren't DFGS-free ?
Per Lundberg
Re: Why Debian's webpages aren't DFGS-free ?
Joey Hess
Re: Why Debian's webpages aren't DFGS-free ?
Chris Lawrence
Re: Why Debian's webpages aren't DFGS-free ?
Joey Hess
Re: Why Debian's webpages aren't DFGS-free ?
James A. Treacy
Re: Why Debian's webpages aren't DFGS-free ?
Joey Hess
Re: Why Debian's webpages aren't DFGS-free ?
James A. Treacy
Re: Why Debian's webpages aren't DFGS-free ?
Joey Hess
Re: Why Debian's webpages aren't DFGS-free ?
Craig Small
Re: Why Debian's webpages aren't DFGS-free ?
Joey Hess
Re: Why Debian's webpages aren't DFGS-free ?
Craig Small
Re: Why Debian's webpages aren't DFGS-free ?
Jason Gunthorpe
Re: Why Debian's webpages aren't DFGS-free ?
Joey Hess
Re: Why Debian's webpages aren't DFGS-free ?
Joey Hess
webmin - good news
Gergely Madarasz
Fixing the KDE legal issues
Raul Miller
Re: Fixing the KDE legal issues
Joseph Carter
Re: need sponsorship for sphinx
Joey Hess
kde in debian
Andreas Jellinghaus
Re: kde in debian
Raul Miller
Re: kde in debian
Joey Hess
Is this DFSG-free?
Marcelo E. Magallon
Re: Is this DFSG-free?
Gergely Madarasz
Re: Is this DFSG-free?
Anthony Towns
Re: Is this DFSG-free?
Alex Yukhimets
Copyright problem on some fonts I intend to package
Chanop Silpa-Anan
InfoWorld misinformation
Jacob Kuntz
Re: InfoWorld misinformation
Darren O. Benham
Unidentified subject!
Chanop Silpa-Anan
New Debian website license?
Craig Small
x3270 licenses
Carey Evans
Re: x3270 licenses
Joseph Carter
Re: x3270 licenses
Carey Evans
Re: x3270 licenses
Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
Re: x3270 licenses
Joseph Carter
Re: x3270 licenses
Henning Makholm
Re: x3270 licenses
Brian Ristuccia
Re: x3270 licenses
Henning Makholm
Re: x3270 licenses
Branden Robinson
Re: x3270 licenses
Henning Makholm
Re: x3270 licenses
Ben Pfaff
Re: x3270 licenses
Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
Re: x3270 licenses
Raul Miller
Re: x3270 licenses
Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
Re: x3270 licenses
Peter Makholm
Re: x3270 licenses
Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
Thank you Andreas Pour
Don Sanders
omniorb's copyright is broken
Tomasz Wegrzanowski
Re: Bug#57303: omniorb's copyright is broken
Brent Fulgham
Re: Compuclick Ltda - Debian Vendor Page
Craig Small
Re: Compuclick Ltda - Debian Vendor Page
Branden Robinson
Re: Compuclick Ltda - Debian Vendor Page
Chris Lawrence
Re: Compuclick Ltda - Debian Vendor Page
Henning Makholm
Re: Compuclick Ltda - Debian Vendor Page
Craig Small
Re: The Penguin Machine Re: Debian for kids
Ben Armstrong
Copyright lawyers analysis of Andreas Pour's Interpretation
Don Sanders
Re: Copyright lawyers analysis of Andreas Pour's Interpretation
Chris Lawrence
Re: Copyright lawyers analysis of Andreas Pour's Interpretation
Anthony Towns
Re: Copyright lawyers analysis of Andreas Pour's Interpretation
Joseph Carter
Re: Copyright lawyers analysis of Andreas Pour's Interpretation
Don Sanders
Re: Copyright lawyers analysis of Andreas Pour's Interpretation
Joseph Carter
Re: Copyright lawyers analysis of Andreas Pour's Interpretation
Andreas Pour
Re: Copyright lawyers analysis of Andreas Pour's Interpretation
Anthony Towns
Re: Copyright lawyers analysis of Andreas Pour's Interpretation
Raul Miller
Re: Copyright lawyers analysis of Andreas Pour's Interpretation
Raul Miller
Re: Copyright lawyers analysis of Andreas Pour's Interpretation
Andreas Pour
Re: Copyright lawyers analysis of Andreas Pour's Interpretation
Raul Miller
Re: Copyright lawyers analysis of Andreas Pour's Interpretation
Andreas Pour
Re: Copyright lawyers analysis of Andreas Pour's Interpretation
Raul Miller
Re: Copyright lawyers analysis of Andreas Pour's Interpretation
Andreas Pour
Re: Copyright lawyers analysis of Andreas Pour's Interpretation
Raul Miller
Re: Copyright lawyers analysis of Andreas Pour's Interpretation
Andreas Pour
Re: Copyright lawyers analysis of Andreas Pour's Interpretation
Raul Miller
Re: Copyright lawyers analysis of Andreas Pour's Interpretation
Andreas Pour
Re: Copyright lawyers analysis of Andreas Pour's Interpretation
Raul Miller
Re: Copyright lawyers analysis of Andreas Pour's Interpretation
Andreas Pour
Re: Copyright lawyers analysis of Andreas Pour's Interpretation
Raul Miller
Licensing Problems with Debian Packages (Was Re: Copyright lawyers analysis of Andreas Pour's Interpretation)
Andreas Pour
Re: Licensing Problems with Debian Packages (Was Re: Copyright lawyers analysis of Andreas Pour's Interpretation)
Raul Miller
Re: Licensing Problems with Debian Packages (Was Re: Copyright lawyers analysis of Andreas Pour's Interpretation)
Andreas Pour
Re: Licensing Problems with Debian Packages (Was Re: Copyright lawyers analysis of Andreas Pour's Interpretation)
Chris Lawrence
Re: Licensing Problems with Debian Packages (Was Re: Copyright lawyers analysis of Andreas Pour's Interpretation)
Raul Miller
Re: Licensing Problems with Debian Packages (Was Re: Copyright lawyers analysis of Andreas Pour's Interpretation)
Andreas Pour
Re: Licensing Problems with Debian Packages (Was Re: Copyright lawyers analysis of Andreas Pour's Interpretation)
Raul Miller
Re: Licensing Problems with Debian Packages (Was Re: Copyright lawyers analysis of Andreas Pour's Interpretation)
Andreas Pour
Re: Licensing Problems with Debian Packages (Was Re: Copyright lawyers analysis of Andreas Pour's Interpretation)
Chris Lawrence
Re: Licensing Problems with Debian Packages (Was Re: Copyright lawyers analysis of Andreas Pour's Interpretation)
Andreas Pour
Re: Licensing Problems with Debian Packages (Was Re: Copyright lawyers analysis of Andreas Pour's Interpretation)
Raul Miller
Re: Licensing Problems with Debian Packages (Was Re: Copyright lawyers analysis of Andreas Pour's Interpretation)
Andreas Pour
Re: Licensing Problems with Debian Packages (Was Re: Copyright lawyers analysis of Andreas Pour's Interpretation)
Raul Miller
Re: Licensing Problems with Debian Packages (Was Re: Copyright lawyers analysis of Andreas Pour's Interpretation)
Andreas Pour
Re: Licensing Problems with Debian Packages (Was Re: Copyright lawyers analysis of Andreas Pour's Interpretation)
Raul Miller
Re: Licensing Problems with Debian Packages (Was Re: Copyright lawyers analysis of Andreas Pour's Interpretation)
Andreas Pour
Re: Licensing Problems with Debian Packages (Was Re: Copyright lawyers analysis of Andreas Pour's Interpretation)
Raul Miller
Re: Licensing Problems with Debian Packages (Was Re: Copyright lawyers analysis of Andreas Pour's Interpretation)
Andreas Pour
Re: Licensing Problems with Debian Packages (Was Re: Copyright lawyers analysis of Andreas Pour's Interpretation)
Raul Miller
Re: Licensing Problems with Debian Packages (Was Re: Copyright lawyers analysis of Andreas Pour's Interpretation)
Andreas Pour
Re: Licensing Problems with Debian Packages (Was Re: Copyright lawyers analysis of Andreas Pour's Interpretation)
Raul Miller
Re: Licensing Problems with Debian Packages (Was Re: Copyright lawyers analysis of Andreas Pour's Interpretation)
Andreas Pour
Re: Licensing Problems with Debian Packages (Was Re: Copyright lawyers analysis of Andreas Pour's Interpretation)
Raul Miller
UCITA bans GPL
William T Wilson
Re: UCITA bans GPL
Raul Miller
Re: UCITA bans GPL
William T Wilson
Re: UCITA bans GPL
Raul Miller
Re: UCITA bans GPL
John Galt
Re: Licensing Problems with Debian Packages (Was Re: Copyright lawyers analysis of Andreas Pour's Interpretation)
Raul Miller
Re: Licensing Problems with Debian Packages (Was Re: Copyright lawyers analysis of Andreas Pour's Interpretation)
Andreas Pour
Re: Licensing Problems with Debian Packages (Was Re: Copyright lawyers analysis of Andreas Pour's Interpretation)
Raul Miller
Re: Licensing Problems with Debian Packages (Was Re: Copyright lawyers analysis of Andreas Pour's Interpretation)
Andreas Pour
Re: Licensing Problems with Debian Packages (Was Re: Copyright lawyers analysis of Andreas Pour's Interpretation)
Raul Miller
Heart of the debate
Don Sanders
Re: Heart of the debate
Raul Miller
Re: Heart of the debate
Don Sanders
Re: Heart of the debate
Raul Miller
Re: Heart of the debate
Don Sanders
Re: Copyright lawyers analysis of Andreas Pour's Interpretation
Raul Miller
Re: Copyright lawyers analysis of Andreas Pour's Interpretation
Don Sanders
Re: Copyright lawyers analysis of Andreas Pour's Interpretation
Raul Miller
Re: Copyright lawyers analysis of Andreas Pour's Interpretation
Henning Makholm
Re: Copyright lawyers analysis of Andreas Pour's Interpretation
Raul Miller
Re: Copyright lawyers analysis of Andreas Pour's Interpretation
Henning Makholm
Re: Copyright lawyers analysis of Andreas Pour's Interpretation
Raul Miller
Re: Copyright lawyers analysis of Andreas Pour's Interpretation
Henning Makholm
Re: Copyright lawyers analysis of Andreas Pour's Interpretation
Raul Miller
Re: Copyright lawyers analysis of Andreas Pour's Interpretation
Henning Makholm
Re: Copyright lawyers analysis of Andreas Pour's Interpretation
Raul Miller
Re: Copyright lawyers analysis of Andreas Pour's Interpretation
Henning Makholm
Re: Copyright lawyers analysis of Andreas Pour's Interpretation
Raul Miller
Re: Copyright lawyers analysis of Andreas Pour's Interpretation
Henning Makholm
Re: Copyright lawyers analysis of Andreas Pour's Interpretation
Joseph Carter
Re: Copyright lawyers analysis of Andreas Pour's Interpretation
Raul Miller
Re: Copyright lawyers analysis of Andreas Pour's Interpretation
Don Sanders
Re: Copyright lawyers analysis of Andreas Pour's Interpretation
Andreas Pour
Re: Copyright lawyers analysis of Andreas Pour's Interpretation
Raul Miller
Re: Copyright lawyers analysis of Andreas Pour's Interpretation
Andreas Pour
New Debian Website License [LAST CHANCE]
Craig Small
Re: New Debian Website License [LAST CHANCE]
Darren O. Benham
Re: New Debian Website License [LAST CHANCE]
Craig Small
Re: New Debian Website License [LAST CHANCE]
Nils Lohner
Re: New Debian Website License [LAST CHANCE]
Jesus M. Gonzalez-Barahona
Re: New Debian Website License [LAST CHANCE]
Brian Ristuccia
Re: New Debian Website License [LAST CHANCE]
Craig Small
Re: New Debian Website License [LAST CHANCE]
Darren O. Benham
Re: New Debian Website License [LAST CHANCE]
Brian Ristuccia
Re: New Debian Website License [LAST CHANCE]
peter karlsson
Re: New Debian Website License [LAST CHANCE]
Craig Small
Re: New Debian Website License [LAST CHANCE]
Darren O. Benham
QPL quick check
Hamish Moffatt
Re: QPL quick check
Joseph Carter
Re: QPL quick check
Raul Miller
Re: QPL quick check
Henning Makholm
Re: QPL quick check
Marc van Leeuwen
Re: QPL quick check
Henning Makholm
Re: QPL quick check
Raul Miller
Invoice? [was: Fashion Photographer's portfolio-Paris]
Kristoffer . Rose
Re: Invoice? [was: Fashion Photographer's portfolio-Paris]
Adam Heath
Re: Invoice? [was: Fashion Photographer's portfolio-Paris]
Raul Miller
Re: Invoice? [was: Fashion Photographer's portfolio-Paris]
John Hasler
Re: Invoice? [was: Fashion Photographer's portfolio-Paris]
Raul Miller
Fwd: Re: Heart of the debate
Don Sanders
Re: Fwd: Re: Heart of the debate
Raul Miller
Re: Fwd: Re: Heart of the debate
Don Sanders
Re: Heart of the debate
Marc van Leeuwen
Re: Heart of the debate
Andreas Pour
Re: Heart of the debate
Marc van Leeuwen
Re: Heart of the debate
Andreas Pour
Re: Heart of the debate
Raul Miller
Re: Heart of the debate
Andreas Pour
Re: Heart of the debate
Don Sanders
Re: Heart of the debate
Andreas Pour
Re: Heart of the debate
Don Sanders
Re: Heart of the debate
Raul Miller
Re: Heart of the debate
Raul Miller
Re: Heart of the debate
Raul Miller
Re: Heart of the debate
Marc van Leeuwen
Re: Heart of the debate
Marc van Leeuwen
Re: Heart of the debate
Andreas Pour
Re: Heart of the debate
Don Sanders
Re: Heart of the debate
Don Sanders
Re: Heart of the debate
Marc van Leeuwen
Re: Heart of the debate
Andreas Pour
Re: Heart of the debate
Don Sanders
Re: Heart of the debate
Don Sanders
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: Heart of the debate
Don Sanders
Re: Heart of the debate
Don Sanders
Fwd: Re: Heart of the debate
Don Sanders
Re: Fwd: Re: Heart of the debate
Raul Miller
Re: Fwd: Re: Heart of the debate
Don Sanders
Re: Fwd: Re: Heart of the debate
Raul Miller
Re: Heart of the debate
Don Sanders
GPLv3 suggestion to solve KDE/QT problem and others
Adi Stav
Re: GPLv3 suggestion to solve KDE/QT problem and others
Joseph Carter
Re: GPLv3 suggestion to solve KDE/QT problem and others
Lynn Winebarger
Re: GPLv3 suggestion to solve KDE/QT problem and others
Adi Stav
Re: GPLv3 suggestion to solve KDE/QT problem and others
Raul Miller
Re: GPLv3 suggestion to solve KDE/QT problem and others
Adi Stav
Re: GPLv3 suggestion to solve KDE/QT problem and others
Raul Miller
Re: GPLv3 suggestion to solve KDE/QT problem and others
Adi Stav
Re: GPLv3 suggestion to solve KDE/QT problem and others
Raul Miller
Re: GPLv3 suggestion to solve KDE/QT problem and others
Adi Stav
Re: GPLv3 suggestion to solve KDE/QT problem and others
Raul Miller
Re: GPLv3 suggestion to solve KDE/QT problem and others
Adi Stav
Re: GPLv3 suggestion to solve KDE/QT problem and others
Raul Miller
Re: GPLv3 suggestion to solve KDE/QT problem and others
Adi Stav
Re: GPLv3 suggestion to solve KDE/QT problem and others
Ben Pfaff
Re: GPLv3 suggestion to solve KDE/QT problem and others
Adi Stav
Re: GPLv3 suggestion to solve KDE/QT problem and others
Raul Miller
Re: GPLv3 suggestion to solve KDE/QT problem and others
Adi Stav
Re: GPLv3 suggestion to solve KDE/QT problem and others
Raul Miller
Re: GPLv3 suggestion to solve KDE/QT problem and others
Adi Stav
Re: GPLv3 suggestion to solve KDE/QT problem and others
Raul Miller
Re: GPLv3 suggestion to solve KDE/QT problem and others
Adi Stav
Re: GPLv3 suggestion to solve KDE/QT problem and others
Raul Miller
Re: GPLv3 suggestion to solve KDE/QT problem and others
Adi Stav
Re: GPLv3 suggestion to solve KDE/QT problem and others
Adi Stav
Re: GPLv3 suggestion to solve KDE/QT problem and others
Raul Miller
Re: GPLv3 suggestion to solve KDE/QT problem and others
Adi Stav
Re: GPLv3 suggestion to solve KDE/QT problem and others
Raul Miller
Re: GPLv3 suggestion to solve KDE/QT problem and others
Adi Stav
Re: GPLv3 suggestion to solve KDE/QT problem and others
Raul Miller
Re: GPLv3 suggestion to solve KDE/QT problem and others
Adi Stav
Re: GPLv3 suggestion to solve KDE/QT problem and others
Raul Miller
Re: GPLv3 suggestion to solve KDE/QT problem and others
dstarner98
Re: ITP: vice and vice-roms
David Starner
Re: ITP: vice and vice-roms
Zed Pobre
Re: ITP: vice and vice-roms
David Starner
Re: ITP: vice and vice-roms
Brian Ristuccia
Re: ITP: vice and vice-roms
Lynn Winebarger
Re: ITP: vice and vice-roms
Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
Re: ITP: vice and vice-roms
Carey Evans
Object code vs source code
Don Sanders
Re: Object code vs source code
Raul Miller
Re: Object code vs source code
Don Sanders
Re: Object code vs source code
Don Sanders
Re: Object code vs source code
Raul Miller
New website License
Craig Small
Re: New website License
peter karlsson
Fwd: License problem with DEC SRC Modula-3
Mike Goldman
graphviz license
Philip Hands
Re: graphviz license
Richard Braakman
An advise how to apply for the TkMan author to change his license.
Shaul Karl
Re: An advise how to apply for the TkMan author to change his license.
David Starner
FW: IBM Developer Kit for Linux, Java Technology Edition and Debi an
Varga Róbert
FW: IBM Developer Kit for Linux, Java Technology Edition and Debi an (fwd)
Robert Varga
sorry for posting twice
Robert Varga
The last update was on 12:42 GMT Sun Aug 16. There are 404 messages. Page 1 of 1.
[
previous month
]
[
first page
]
[previous page]
Page 1 of 1
[next page]
[
last page
]
[
next month
]
[
Date Index
] [
Subject Index
] [
Author Index
] [
Other Debian Lists
] [
Debian Home
]
Mail converted by
MHonArc