debian-legal Feb 2000 by subject
|
[previous page]
|
Page 1 of 1 |
[next page]
|
|
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[Other Debian Lists]
[Debian Home]
An advise how to apply for the TkMan author to change his license.
Re: bibindex should probably be GPLed.
Re: Bug#57303: omniorb's copyright is broken
Re: Compuclick Ltda - Debian Vendor Page
Copyright lawyers analysis of Andreas Pour's Interpretation
Copyright problem on some fonts I intend to package
Fixing the KDE legal issues
GPLv3 suggestion to solve KDE/QT problem and others
graphviz license
Heart of the debate
FW: IBM Developer Kit for Linux, Java Technology Edition and Debi an
FW: IBM Developer Kit for Linux, Java Technology Edition and Debi an (fwd)
InfoWorld misinformation
Invoice? [was: Fashion Photographer's portfolio-Paris]
Is this DFSG-free?
Re: ITP: vice and vice-roms
kde in debian
Re: KDE not in Debian?
Fwd: License problem with DEC SRC Modula-3
Licensing Problems with Debian Packages (Was Re: Copyright lawyers analysis of Andreas Pour's Interpretation)
Re: Licensing Problems with Debian Packages (Was Re: Copyright lawyers analysis of Andreas Pour's Interpretation)
Re: need sponsorship for sphinx
New Debian website license?
New Debian Website License [LAST CHANCE]
Re: New OPL Draft
Re: New ways to evade copyright law (was Re: Vicarious liblity (was: KDE not in Debian?))
New ways to evade copyright law (was Re: Vicarious liblity (was: KDE not in Debian?))
New website License
Object code vs source code
omniorb's copyright is broken
On interpreting licences (was: KDE not in Debian?)
Re: The Penguin Machine Re: Debian for kids
QPL quick check
sorry for posting twice
Thank you Andreas Pour
UCITA bans GPL
Unidentified subject!
Vicarious liblity (was: KDE not in Debian?)
webmin - good news
Why Debian's webpages aren't DFGS-free ?
x3270 licenses
The last update was on 12:42 GMT Sun Aug 16. There are 404 messages. Page 1 of 1.
[Thread Index]
[Subject Index]
[Author Index]
[Other Debian Lists]
[Debian Home]
Mail converted by MHonArc