Re: GPLv3 suggestion to solve KDE/QT problem and others
On Mon, Feb 21, 2000 at 10:07:27PM +0200, Adi Stav wrote:
> > QPLed code can't be distributed under the GPL. Code which is linked
> > into the program is part of the program. What part of that don't you
> > understand?
>
> I can't see how it would allow Troll to re-release GPL code under the
> QPL, or (more to the point, as I've agreed that the QPL should not
> considered a Free license) how anyone could re-release GPL code under
> a different Free license other than the GPL.
Ok, so you've agreed that QPL should not be considered a free license.
Wouldn't you then say that if QPLed code is incorporated into a GPLed
program that that part of the GPLed program would not be free?
> Anyhow, if you consider any Free license a "good enough" license than
> additions or mofifications to your code under such a license are also
> ok.
>
But if the QPL is not a Free license, why should it be considered
"good enough"?
Not sure I'm understanding your point...
--
Raul
Reply to: