Re: Copyright lawyers analysis of Andreas Pour's Interpretation
On Mon, 14 Feb 2000, Raul Miller wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 11, 2000 at 04:56:50PM -0800, Joseph Carter wrote:
> > The full source code to the binary created does include the source
> > code to Qt, yes. (without Qt, the binary cannot be compiled (headers)
> > and linked dynamically (direct object code and associated symbols)
> >
> > I cannot fathom how this could be a point of contention; it seems
> > blatantly obvious to me.
>
> I must agree with Joseph that this is an issue. After all, Troll objected
> to the (now inactive) Harmony project using Troll header files for their
> Qt clone.
I apologize, my question about the definition of complete source was something
of a dude. After posting it I realised the definition wasn't the most important
issue and that is why I didn't follow it up.
I do feel that the definition of complete source in the GPL could be clearer.
Again I apologize for asking an unnecessary question.
BFN,
Don.
Reply to: