Re: Copyright lawyers analysis of Andreas Pour's Interpretation
On Fri, Feb 11, 2000 at 09:04:02PM +1100, Don Sanders wrote:
> I have been researching your comments. Especially the thread containing this
> mail:
> http://www.debian.org/Lists-Archives/debian-legal-0002/msg00133.html
>
> Am I correct in stating that under your interpretation of the GPL "the
> complete source code of a KDE application (that uses QT and hence requires
> being linked to QT) includes the QT source code."?
>
> And am I correct in saying that this fact is central to your argument?
Allow me to phrase it this way:
"The complete source code for a program which, when running normally,
consistently includes both QPL and GPL licensed machine code must include
both QPL licensed source code and GPL licensed source code."
That concept is central to my argument.
--
Raul
Reply to: