debian-legal Aug 2003 by date
[
previous month
]
[
first page
]
[previous page]
Page 1 of 3
[
next page
]
[
last page
]
[
next month
]
[
Thread Index
] [
Subject Index
] [
Author Index
] [
Other Debian Lists
] [
Debian Home
]
Aug 01
Re: GNU FDL and Debian
Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: Bug#156287: Advice on Drip (ITP #156287)
Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach
Brian Nelson
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach
David B Harris
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach
Henning Makholm
Inconsistencies in our approach
John Goerzen
Re: Bug#156287: Advice on Drip (ITP #156287)
Brian T. Sniffen
please check mplayer 0.90-3
A Mennucc1
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach
Brian T. Sniffen
License evaluation sought
Tore Anderson
Re: License evaluation sought
Brian T. Sniffen
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach
Manoj Srivastava
Re: License evaluation sought
Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker
Re: License evaluation sought
Tore Anderson
Re: License evaluation sought
Joe Wreschnig
Re: License evaluation sought
Tore Anderson
Re: License evaluation sought
Richard Braakman
Aug 02
Re: License evaluation sought
Joe Wreschnig
Re: License evaluation sought
Tore Anderson
Re: Should our documentation be free? (Was Re: Inconsistencies in our approach)
Sergey V. Spiridonov
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach
Branden Robinson
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach
John H. Robinson, IV
perl modules' default licence
Nicholas Clark
msession copyright
Joerg Wendland
Re: msession copyright
Jakob Bohm
Re: perl modules' default licence
Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach
Manoj Srivastava
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach
Joe Wreschnig
Aug 03
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach
Sergey V. Spiridonov
Re: msession copyright
Matthew Palmer
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach
Nick Phillips
Re: perl modules' default licence
Jakob Bohm
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach
John H. Robinson, IV
Re: msession copyright
Joerg Wendland
Re: perl modules' default licence
Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS
Re: License evaluation sought
Tore Anderson
Re: Should our documentation be free? (Was Re: Inconsistencies in our approach)
Claus Färber
Re: Should our documentation be free? (Was Re: Inconsistencies in our approach)
Nathanael Nerode
Re: perl modules' default licence
Jakob Bohm
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach
Nathanael Nerode
Re: Should our documentation be free? (Was Re: Inconsistencies in our approach)
Joe Wreschnig
Re: License evaluation sought
Joe Wreschnig
Re: License evaluation sought
Tore Anderson
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach
Jakob Bohm
Re: Should our documentation be free? (Was Re: Inconsistencies in our approach)
MJ Ray
a minimal copyleft
Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS
Aug 04
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach
Dylan Thurston
Re: a minimal copyleft
Keith Stephen Dunwoody
Re: a minimal copyleft
Jacobo Tarrio
Re: Should our documentation be free? (Was Re: Inconsistencies in
Joe Moore
Re: Should our documentation be free? (Was Re: Inconsistencies in
Brian T. Sniffen
Take a Fantasy Cruise with Me!
Katrina
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach
Branden Robinson
Lossless JPEG software, a patch without a license
Steve King
Re: Should our documentation be free? (Was Re: Inconsistencies in our approach)
Branden Robinson
Re: License evaluation sought
Branden Robinson
Re: a minimal copyleft
Branden Robinson
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach
Lynn Winebarger
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach
Henning Makholm
Re: a minimal copyleft
Andrew Suffield
Re: a minimal copyleft
Richard Braakman
Re: a minimal copyleft
Glenn Maynard
Re: Should our documentation be free? (Was Re: Inconsistencies in
Joe Moore
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach
Nathanael Nerode
Aug 05
Re: Lossless JPEG software, a patch without a license
Matthew Palmer
Re: Should our documentation be free? (Was Re: Inconsistencies in
Joe Wreschnig
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach
Branden Robinson
Re: a minimal copyleft
Andrew Suffield
Re: a minimal copyleft
Joe Wreschnig
Re: a minimal copyleft
Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS
Re: Should our documentation be free? (Was Re: Inconsistencies in
Joe Moore
Re: a minimal copyleft
Joe Wreschnig
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach
Joey Hess
Re: Should our documentation be free? (Was Re: Inconsistencies in
Joe Wreschnig
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach
Joe Wreschnig
Re: Should our documentation be free? (Was Re: Inconsistencies in
Joe Moore
Re: a minimal copyleft
Anthony DeRobertis
Re: a minimal copyleft
Anthony DeRobertis
Re: Should our documentation be free? (Was Re: Inconsistencies in
Brian T. Sniffen
Re: a minimal copyleft
Glenn Maynard
Re: a minimal copyleft
Andrew Suffield
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach
MJ Ray
Re: a minimal copyleft
Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS
Re: a minimal copyleft
Steve Langasek
Re: Should our documentation be free? (Was Re: Inconsistencies in our approach)
Sergey V. Spiridonov
Re: a minimal copyleft
Joe Wreschnig
Re: Should our documentation be free? (Was Re: Inconsistencies in
Joe Wreschnig
Re: Should our documentation be free? (Was Re: Inconsistencies in
Scott James Remnant
Re: Should our documentation be free? (Was Re: Inconsistencies in our approach)
Matthew Garrett
Aug 06
Re: a minimal copyleft
Andrew Suffield
Re: a minimal copyleft
Andrew Suffield
Re: Should our documentation be free? (Was Re: Inconsistencies in
Andrew Suffield
Re: a minimal copyleft
Steve Langasek
Re: mplayer licenses
gabucino
Re: Should our documentation be free? (Was Re: Inconsistencies in
Joe Moore
Re: Should our documentation be free? (Was Re: Inconsistencies in
Joe Moore
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach
Joe Moore
Re: perl modules' default licence
Nicholas Clark
Aug 07
semi-OT: does SPI have cause of action against SCO?
Steve Langasek
Re: a minimal copyleft
Stephane Bortzmeyer
Re: a minimal copyleft
Stephane Bortzmeyer
APSL 2.0
Jens Schmalzing
Re: mplayer licenses
Josselin Mouette
Re: mplayer licenses
gabucino
Re: APSL 2.0
Adam Warner
Re: mplayer licenses
Josselin Mouette
Re: mplayer licenses
gabucino
Re: APSL 2.0
Lynn Winebarger
Re: mplayer licenses
Adam Warner
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach
Lynn Winebarger
Re: APSL 2.0
MJ Ray
mozilla export restrictions
Wolfgang Fischer
Re: APSL 2.0
Adam Warner
Re: APSL 2.0
Adam Warner
Re: APSL 2.0
Stephen Ryan
Re: APSL 2.0
Matthew Palmer
Re: APSL 2.0
Matthew Palmer
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach
MJ Ray
Re: APSL 2.0
MJ Ray
Re: APSL 2.0
MJ Ray
Re: mozilla export restrictions
Florian Weimer
Re: mozilla export restrictions
Barak Pearlmutter
Re: APSL 2.0
Jeremy Hankins
Re: APSL 2.0
Brian T. Sniffen
Re: APSL 2.0
Bernhard R. Link
Re: mozilla export restrictions
Wolfgang Fischer
Re: APSL 2.0
Brian T. Sniffen
Re: APSL 2.0
Adam Warner
Re: mozilla export restrictions
Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker
Re: APSL 2.0
MJ Ray
Re: APSL 2.0
Adam Warner
Re: APSL 2.0
Stephen Ryan
Re: {debian-legal} Re: APSL 2.0
M. Drew Streib
Re: APSL 2.0
Mark Rafn
Re: APSL 2.0: does "complete source code" exclude data?
Mark Rafn
Re: APSL 2.0
Jeremy Hankins
Re: {debian-legal} Re: APSL 2.0
Mark Rafn
A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Wouter Verhelst
Re: {debian-legal} Re: APSL 2.0
Brian T. Sniffen
Re: APSL 2.0
Brian Kimball
Re: a minimal copyleft
Anthony DeRobertis
Re: a minimal copyleft
Anthony DeRobertis
Re: APSL 2.0
MJ Ray
Re: a minimal copyleft
Anthony DeRobertis
Re: a minimal copyleft
Anthony DeRobertis
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
MJ Ray
Re: APSL 2.0
Mark Rafn
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Andrew Suffield
Re: APSL 2.0
Jeremy Hankins
Re: APSL 2.0
Brian Kimball
Re: APSL 2.0
Branden Robinson
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Wouter Verhelst
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Nathanael Nerode
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Wouter Verhelst
Re: semi-OT: does SPI have cause of action against SCO?
Nathanael Nerode
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Wouter Verhelst
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach
John Goerzen
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach
John Goerzen
Re: APSL 2.0
Brian T. Sniffen
Re: APSL 2.0
Mark Rafn
Re: a minimal copyleft
Andrew Suffield
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach
John Goerzen
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach
John Goerzen
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Josselin Mouette
Re: APSL 2.0
MJ Ray
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach
Steve Langasek
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Andrew Suffield
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
MJ Ray
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Andrew Suffield
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Wouter Verhelst
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach
MJ Ray
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach
MJ Ray
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach
Andrew Suffield
Aug 08
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Matthew Garrett
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach
Matthew Garrett
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
MJ Ray
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach
Brian T. Sniffen
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach
Sergey V. Spiridonov
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Henning Makholm
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach
Brian T. Sniffen
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach
John Goerzen
Re: APSL 2.0
Anthony DeRobertis
Re: APSL 2.0
Anthony DeRobertis
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach
Anthony DeRobertis
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Anthony DeRobertis
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach
John Goerzen
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach
John Goerzen
Re: APSL 2.0
Henning Makholm
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach
Henning Makholm
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach
John Goerzen
Re: APSL 2.0
Jeremy Hankins
Re: A possible approach in 'solving' the FDL problem
Brian T. Sniffen
Re: APSL 2.0
Jeremy Hankins
Is the Apache Software License DFSG-compliant?
Pierre THIERRY
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach
Matthew Garrett
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach
Lynn Winebarger
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Lynn Winebarger
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach
John Goerzen
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach
John Goerzen
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach
John Goerzen
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach
Lynn Winebarger
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach
John Goerzen
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach
John Goerzen
Re: Is the Apache Software License DFSG-compliant?
Scott James Remnant
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach
Matthew Garrett
Re: Is the Apache Software License DFSG-compliant?
Adam Warner
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach
Steve Langasek
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Wouter Verhelst
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Wouter Verhelst
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach
Nathanael Nerode
Re: A possible approach in 'solving' the FDL problem
Wouter Verhelst
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach
Nathanael Nerode
Re: APSL 2.0
Mark Rafn
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach
Nathanael Nerode
Re: APSL 2.0
Nathanael Nerode
EBCDIC (WAS: Re: a minimal copyleft)
Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS
Re: APSL 2.0
Arnoud Galactus Engelfriet
gif-creating applications?
Andreas Barth
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach
Matthew Garrett
Re: APSL 2.0
Jeremy Hankins
Re: APSL 2.0
Jeremy Hankins
Re: semi-OT: does SPI have cause of action against SCO?
andrew
Re: A possible approach in 'solving' the FDL problem
Brian T. Sniffen
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach
Brian T. Sniffen
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach
Andrew Suffield
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach
Andrew Suffield
Re: APSL 2.0
Mark Rafn
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach
John H. Robinson, IV
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach
Joe Moore
Re: APSL 2.0
Jeremy Hankins
Re: APSL 2.0
Brian T. Sniffen
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Claus Färber
Aug 09
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach
Dylan Thurston
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach
Fedor Zuev
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Anthony DeRobertis
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach
Wouter Verhelst
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach
Matthew Garrett
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Kai Henningsen
Re: Should our documentation be free? (Was Re: Inconsistencies in our approach)
Sergey V. Spiridonov
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Brian T. Sniffen
Aug 10
Re: Should our documentation be free? (Was Re: Inconsistencies in our approach)
Matthew Garrett
Re: Should our documentation be free? (Was Re: Inconsistencies in our approach)
Adam Warner
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach
Anthony DeRobertis
Re: APSL 2.0
Anthony DeRobertis
Re: APSL 2.0
Anthony DeRobertis
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach
Anthony DeRobertis
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Nick Phillips
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach
Nick Phillips
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach
Andrew Suffield
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Sergey V. Spiridonov
Re: A possible approach in 'solving' the FDL problem
Sergey V. Spiridonov
Aug 11
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Anthony DeRobertis
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Anthony DeRobertis
Re: A possible approach in 'solving' the FDL problem
Anthony DeRobertis
Re: A possible approach in 'solving' the FDL problem
Sergey V. Spiridonov
Re: A possible approach in 'solving' the FDL problem
Andrew Suffield
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Andrew Suffield
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
MJ Ray
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
MJ Ray
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
MJ Ray
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach
MJ Ray
Re: Should our documentation be free? (Was Re: Inconsistencies in our approach)
Stephane Bortzmeyer
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach
Stephane Bortzmeyer
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Neil McGovern
Re: DFSG intent question
Bruce Perens
5000円で開業しませんか!!
5000円で開業しませんか!!
Re: APSL 2.0
Branden Robinson
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Branden Robinson
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Branden Robinson
Re: A possible approach in 'solving' the FDL problem
Branden Robinson
Re: A possible approach in 'solving' the FDL problem
Branden Robinson
PROCLAMATION REGARDING SOFTWARE AND DOCUMENTATION
Branden Robinson
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Branden Robinson
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Branden Robinson
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Branden Robinson
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Andrew Suffield
Re: APSL 2.0
Andrew Suffield
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Peter S Galbraith
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Branden Robinson
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Branden Robinson
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Branden Robinson
Aug 12
Re: APSL 2.0
Jeremy Hankins
Re: APSL 2.0
Jeremy Hankins
Re: A possible approach in 'solving' the FDL problem
Wouter Verhelst
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Wouter Verhelst
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Wouter Verhelst
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach
Nathanael Nerode
Re: Should our documentation be free?
Nathanael Nerode
Re: Should our documentation be free?
Nathanael Nerode
Re: Should our documentation be free?
Nathanael Nerode
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach
Nathanael Nerode
Re: DFSG intent question
Nathanael Nerode
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Nathanael Nerode
Re: A possible approach in 'solving' the FDL problem
Branden Robinson
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Branden Robinson
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Branden Robinson
Re: DFSG intent question
Branden Robinson
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Sergey V. Spiridonov
Re: A possible approach in 'solving' the FDL problem
Wouter Verhelst
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Wouter Verhelst
Re: A possible approach in 'solving' the FDL problem
Wouter Verhelst
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Andrew Suffield
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
MJ Ray
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
MJ Ray
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
MJ Ray
Re: A possible approach in 'solving' the FDL problem
MJ Ray
Re: Should our documentation be free?
MJ Ray
Re: libdvdcss
Sam Hocevar
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Wouter Verhelst
Re: a minimal copyleft
Joe Wreschnig
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
MJ Ray
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Josselin Mouette
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
MJ Ray
Re: libdvdcss
Joe Drew
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Branden Robinson
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Branden Robinson
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Branden Robinson
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Branden Robinson
Re: A possible approach in 'solving' the FDL problem
Brian T. Sniffen
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Steve Langasek
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach
Manoj Srivastava
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach
Manoj Srivastava
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Sergey V. Spiridonov
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach
Fedor Zuev
A way of looking at Software, Documentation, and Data
Joe Moore
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Josselin Mouette
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Anthony DeRobertis
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
MJ Ray
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
MJ Ray
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Sergey V. Spiridonov
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Fedor Zuev
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Branden Robinson
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Anthony DeRobertis
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Sergey V. Spiridonov
Re: A possible approach in 'solving' the FDL problem
Anthony DeRobertis
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Joe Wreschnig
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Fedor Zuev
Re: A possible approach in 'solving' the FDL problem
Anthony DeRobertis
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Sergey V. Spiridonov
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Sergey V. Spiridonov
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
MJ Ray
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach
Manoj Srivastava
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
MJ Ray
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
MJ Ray
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Branden Robinson
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Josselin Mouette
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Anthony DeRobertis
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach
Anthony DeRobertis
Re: A way of looking at Software, Documentation, and Data
Anthony DeRobertis
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Anthony DeRobertis
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Anthony DeRobertis
Aug 13
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Peter S Galbraith
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Peter S Galbraith
Bug#205152: mldonkey-server: contains obviously illegal non-free code
Robert McQueen
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Stephane Bortzmeyer
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Sergey V. Spiridonov
Re: A possible approach in 'solving' the FDL problem
Branden Robinson
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Branden Robinson
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Branden Robinson
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Sergey V. Spiridonov
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Joe Wreschnig
Re: OT: TV signals [Was: Inconsistencies in our approach]
Joe Wreschnig
Re: OT: TV signals [Was: Inconsistencies in our approach]
Keith Dunwoody
Re: A way of looking at Software, Documentation, and Data
Andrew Suffield
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach
Fedor Zuev
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach
Keith Dunwoody
Re: OT: TV signals [Was: Inconsistencies in our approach]
Joe Wreschnig
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Bernhard R. Link
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
MJ Ray
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Fedor Zuev
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Sergey Spiridonov
RE: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Petrisor Marian
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Sergey Spiridonov
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Bernhard R. Link
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Keith Dunwoody
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach
Nick Phillips
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach
Nick Phillips
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach
Nick Phillips
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Josselin Mouette
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Nick Phillips
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach
Fedor Zuev
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Nick Phillips
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Jeremy Hankins
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach
Fedor Zuev
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Jimmy Kaplowitz
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Steve Langasek
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Fedor Zuev
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
MJ Ray
Re: A possible approach in 'solving' the FDL problem
Joe Moore
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Steve Langasek
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach
Keith Dunwoody
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Peter S Galbraith
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
MJ Ray
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Kyle McMartin
RE: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Fedor Zuev
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Fedor Zuev
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Fedor Zuev
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Sergey V. Spiridonov
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Peter S Galbraith
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Sergey V. Spiridonov
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Peter S Galbraith
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Jeremy Hankins
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Andrew Suffield
Re: A possible approach in 'solving' the FDL problem
Andrew Suffield
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Stephen Ryan
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Sergey V. Spiridonov
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Joe Wreschnig
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
MJ Ray
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Sergey V. Spiridonov
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
MJ Ray
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
MJ Ray
Aug 14
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Sergey V. Spiridonov
a lurker's thoughts on "software"
Carl Witty
Re: Should our documentation be free? (Was Re: Inconsistencies in our approach)
MJ Ray
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Peter S Galbraith
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Sergey V. Spiridonov
Re: Should our documentation be free? (Was Re: Inconsistencies in our approach)
Sergey V. Spiridonov
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Sergey V. Spiridonov
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Sergey V. Spiridonov
unsubscribe
Andrew Smith
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Jacobo Tarrio
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Wouter Verhelst
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Manoj Srivastava
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach
Manoj Srivastava
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Wouter Verhelst
Re: Should our documentation be free? (Was Re: Inconsistencies in our approach)
MJ Ray
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Peter S Galbraith
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Peter S Galbraith
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Anthony DeRobertis
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Anthony DeRobertis
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Fedor Zuev
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Anthony DeRobertis
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Anthony DeRobertis
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Anthony DeRobertis
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Anthony DeRobertis
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem (joke)
Anthony DeRobertis
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Anthony DeRobertis
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Anthony DeRobertis
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Anthony DeRobertis
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Anthony DeRobertis
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Anthony DeRobertis
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Anthony DeRobertis
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Sergey V. Spiridonov
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Fedor Zuev
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Sergey V. Spiridonov
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Peter S Galbraith
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Peter S Galbraith
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Sergey V. Spiridonov
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Fedor Zuev
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Steve Langasek
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Brian T. Sniffen
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach
Anthony DeRobertis
Re: Bug#202723: perl-doc: Non-free manpage included
Mark Jason Dominus
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Jimmy Kaplowitz
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Branden Robinson
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Andrew Suffield
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Sergey V. Spiridonov
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Branden Robinson
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Andrew Suffield
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Andrew Suffield
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem (joke)
Andrew Suffield
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Branden Robinson
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Sergey V. Spiridonov
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Branden Robinson
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Branden Robinson
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach
Anthony DeRobertis
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Branden Robinson
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Branden Robinson
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Branden Robinson
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Branden Robinson
Re: Should our documentation be free? (Was Re: Inconsistencies in our approach)
Sergey V. Spiridonov
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Sergey V. Spiridonov
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Sergey V. Spiridonov
Aug 15
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
MJ Ray
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
MJ Ray
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
John Galt
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Sergey V. Spiridonov
Re: Bug#202723: perl-doc: Non-free manpage included
Branden Robinson
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Branden Robinson
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Branden Robinson
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Sergey V. Spiridonov
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Sergey Spiridonov
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Sergey Spiridonov
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Anthony DeRobertis
Re: Bug#202723: perl-doc: Non-free manpage included
Abigail
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Wouter Verhelst
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Wouter Verhelst
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Wouter Verhelst
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Sergey Spiridonov
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
MJ Ray
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Jacobo Tarrio
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
MJ Ray
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Bernhard R. Link
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Wouter Verhelst
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Wouter Verhelst
Re: Bug#202723: perl-doc: Non-free manpage included
Peter S Galbraith
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Sergey Spiridonov
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
MJ Ray
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
MJ Ray
The last update was on 20:15 GMT Fri Mar 07. There are 1422 messages. Page 1 of 3.
[
previous month
]
[
first page
]
[previous page]
Page 1 of 3
[
next page
]
[
last page
]
[
next month
]
[
Thread Index
] [
Subject Index
] [
Author Index
] [
Other Debian Lists
] [
Debian Home
]
Mail converted by
MHonArc