Le mar 12/08/2003 à 20:47, Sergey V. Spiridonov a écrit : > It is wrong to pick up *some* inconveniences (and even negative aspects) > and call the license non-free. Correct way is to sum up all pros and > cons for the majority of people on the long terms. I'm asking again: where do you set the limit? > FDL is free enough for Debian. FDL is free. Before being able to say that, you should propose a GR to amend the DFSG 3 and 6. > I still wonder why people with the same ardour and consistency do not > speak about distribution of software in the non-free section? Why Debian > distributes non-free? Because there are valuable non-free software. Such as the FSF manuals. -- .''`. Josselin Mouette /\./\ : :' : josselin.mouette@ens-lyon.org `. `' joss@debian.org `- Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=