Re: APSL 2.0

To: debian-legal@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: APSL 2.0
From: Brian Kimball <bk@bk.cx>
Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2003 11:07:14 -0700
Message-id: <[🔎] 20030807180712.GA30331@bk.cx>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] slrnbj4bpl.2d9.markj+0111@bouncing.localnet>
References: <[🔎] hhsmod3n2w.fsf@theorie.physik.uni-muenchen.de> <[🔎] hhsmod3n2w.fsf@theorie.physik.uni-muenchen.de> <[🔎] 1060249133.1386.51.camel@work.consulting.net.nz> <[🔎] slrnbj4bpl.2d9.markj+0111@bouncing.localnet>

MJ Ray wrote:

> It is expected that GPL-3 will contain something similar to the Affero GPL
> requirement for remote services to offer users the code.

We should petition the FSF to go all the way and require a guarantee of
full write access to the machines providing these services.

After all, I can't fix a google bug if I can't apply my patch to google,
right?

[Those bastards.  How dare they keep me off their machines!!!]

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: APSL 2.0
  - From: MJ Ray <markj@cloaked.freeserve.co.uk>

References:
- APSL 2.0
  - From: Jens Schmalzing <jens.schmalzing@physik.uni-muenchen.de>
- Re: APSL 2.0
  - From: Adam Warner <lists@consulting.net.nz>
- Re: APSL 2.0
  - From: MJ Ray <markj@cloaked.freeserve.co.uk>

Prev by Date: Re: {debian-legal} Re: APSL 2.0
Next by Date: Re: a minimal copyleft
Previous by thread: Re: APSL 2.0
Next by thread: Re: APSL 2.0
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread