Re: Inconsistencies in our approach

To: debian-legal@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Inconsistencies in our approach
From: MJ Ray <markj@cloaked.freeserve.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2003 22:19:15 -0000
Message-id: <[🔎] slrnbj5k33.c28.markj+0111@bouncing.localnet>
References: <[🔎] 20030804212745.GA5948@twcny.rr.com> <[🔎] 20030804212745.GA5948@twcny.rr.com> <[🔎] 20030807210818.GA14487@wile.excelhustler.com>

John Goerzen <jgoerzen@complete.org> wrote:
> compelling interest in being able to distribute a modified RFC822?

RFC2822, you mean?  ;-)

Reply to:

References:
- Re: Inconsistencies in our approach
  - From: neroden@twcny.rr.com (Nathanael Nerode)
- Re: Inconsistencies in our approach
  - From: John Goerzen <jgoerzen@complete.org>

Prev by Date: Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Next by Date: Re: Inconsistencies in our approach
Previous by thread: Re: Inconsistencies in our approach
Next by thread: Re: Inconsistencies in our approach
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread