Re: GNU FDL and Debian
- To: Dylan Thurston <dpt@math.harvard.edu>
- Cc: debian-legal@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: GNU FDL and Debian
- From: tb@becket.net (Thomas Bushnell, BSG)
- Date: 31 Jul 2003 21:57:31 -0700
- Message-id: <[🔎] 87fzkmvutg.fsf@becket.becket.net>
- In-reply-to: <slrnbijsm0.bo3.dpt@lotus.math.harvard.edu>
- References: <3F1DF042.7010701@hurd.homeunix.org> <slrnbihnhr.3jh.markj+0111@bouncing.localnet> <slrnbiibac.62l.dpt@lotus.math.harvard.edu> <slrnbiih42.chg.markj+0111@bouncing.localnet> <slrnbiioks.8f4.dpt@lotus.math.harvard.edu> <87wudywciu.fsf@becket.becket.net> <slrnbijsm0.bo3.dpt@lotus.math.harvard.edu>
Dylan Thurston <dpt@math.harvard.edu> writes:
> Err, who are you arguing against? I do not espouse the position
> above. You do a good job arguing against it, but it is unlikely that
> RMS will read what you wrote... (I'm also not someone you need to
> convince.)
I wasn't taking myself to be arguing against you. I was agreeing, and
trying to restate the point as well as possible.
Reply to: