Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem

To: debian-legal@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
From: Nick Phillips <nwp@nz.lemon-computing.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2003 00:37:09 +1200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20030813123709.GE13257@hoiho.nz.lemon-computing.com>
Mail-followup-to: debian-legal@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] slrnbjhbv0.t6s.markj+0111@bouncing.localnet>
References: <[🔎] 20030808052146.GC18651@grep.be> <[🔎] slrnbjepnh.ejq.markj+0111@bouncing.localnet> <[🔎] slrnbjepnh.ejq.markj+0111@bouncing.localnet> <[🔎] 20030811224615.GE8842@grep.be> <[🔎] slrnbjhbv0.t6s.markj+0111@bouncing.localnet>

On Tue, Aug 12, 2003 at 09:14:08AM -0000, MJ Ray wrote:

> Trying to unravel negations: Do you think documentation should not be
> free because you feel the rules of free documentation should be different
> from programs?

You are ELIZA and I claim my free therapy session!

-- 
Nick Phillips -- nwp@lemon-computing.com
Beware of a dark-haired man with a loud tie.

Reply to:

References:
- Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
  - From: Wouter Verhelst <wouter@grep.be>
- Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
  - From: MJ Ray <markj@cloaked.freeserve.co.uk>
- Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
  - From: Wouter Verhelst <wouter@grep.be>
- Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
  - From: MJ Ray <markj@cloaked.freeserve.co.uk>

Prev by Date: Re: Inconsistencies in our approach
Next by Date: Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Previous by thread: Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Next by thread: Re: A possible approach in 'solving' the FDL problem
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread