[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: License evaluation sought



Tore Anderson <tore@linpro.no> writes:

>   Hi,
>
>   I would like to have the list members' opinion on the following
>  license, which is about to be applied to the data files of an old
>  adventure game:

It's non-free.  There's no permission to create a derivative work, or
to distribute such a derivative.

-Brian

> Preamble:
>   Basically, give this game away, share it with your friends. Don't 
> remove this Readme, or pretend you wrote it. You can include it in a 
> software collection, like a linux distribution or coverdisk (which 
> may be sold), but using it in things like commercial adventure game 
> collections without asking is just playing dirty. This preamble is 
> not legally binding, but is to clarify the intent of the following 
> license.
>
> License:
>  1) You may distribute this game for free on any medium, provided this 
> readme and all associated copyright notices and disclaimers are left 
> intact.
>
>  2) You may charge a reasonable copying fee for this archive, and may 
> distribute it in aggregate as part of a larger & possibly commercial 
> software distribution (such as a Linux distribution or magazine 
> coverdisk). You must provide proper attribution and ensure this 
> readme and all associated copyright notices, and disclaimers are left 
> intact.
>
>  3) You may not charge a fee for the game itself. This includes 
> reselling the game as an individual item.
>
>  4) All game content is (C) Revolution Software Ltd. The ScummVM 
> engine is (C) The ScummVM Team (www.scummvm.org)
>
>  5) THE GAMEDATA IN THIS ARCHIVE IS PROVIDED "AS IS" AND WITHOUT ANY 
> EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING AND NOT LIMITED TO ANY 
> IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTIBILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR 
> PURPOSE.
> ~~~
>
>   At first I had my doubts about paragraph 3, but after having read
>  the Artistic license, whose paragraph 5 involves the same restriction
>  while still being DFSG-free, I would assume this is acceptable for
>  inclusion in main.  But do comment, legalese is not one of my strong
>  points.
>
>   This software will be publically released soon, so swift replies
>  would be much appreciated -- I might be able to talk upstream into
>  adjusting the license before releasing, if it is necessary to satisfy
>  the DFSG.
>
> Thanks in advance,
> -- 
> Tore Anderson

-- 
Brian T. Sniffen                                        bts@alum.mit.edu
                       http://www.evenmere.org/~bts/



Reply to: