On Tue, 2003-08-12 at 17:24, Sergey V. Spiridonov wrote: > Why clearly non-free things are in Debian? Is it because of Social > Contract? Why moving FDL becomes more important, than removing non-free? Because this isn't the forum for discussing the removal of non-free? And because the discussion about removing non-free has to wait until the shelved[0] amendment about changing founding documents, which was/is waiting for the now-completed voting amendment? And, BTW, non-free isn't part of Debian. [0] Thanks for the term, Branden!
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part