Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem

To: debian-legal@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
From: "Sergey V. Spiridonov" <sena@hurd.homeunix.org>
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2003 01:17:25 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] bhh5a5$7eh$1@sea.gmane.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 29C06398-CE89-11D7-ADFA-00039317863E@suespammers.org>
References: <[🔎] bhe56d$b10$1@sea.gmane.org> <[🔎] 29C06398-CE89-11D7-ADFA-00039317863E@suespammers.org>

Anthony DeRobertis wrote:

There are only a few people, yourself included, who seem like they mightdisagree with one or both of the above conclusions. Please go ahead and


Sorry about this.
--
Best regards, Sergey Spiridonov

Reply to:

References:
- Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
  - From: "Sergey V. Spiridonov" <sena@hurd.homeunix.org>
- Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
  - From: Anthony DeRobertis <asd@suespammers.org>

Prev by Date: Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Next by Date: Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Previous by thread: Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Next by thread: Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread