Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem

To: debian-legal@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
From: Peter S Galbraith <p.galbraith@globetrotter.net>
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 21:07:10 -0400
Message-id: <[🔎] 25134.1060650430@mixed>
In-reply-to: Message from Andrew Suffield <asuffield@debian.org> of "Mon, 11 Aug 2003 21:22:33 BST." <[🔎] 20030811202233.GC19792@doc.ic.ac.uk>
References: <[🔎] 20030807174320.GA17691@grep.be> <[🔎] 20030807191258.GA28239@doc.ic.ac.uk> <[🔎] 20030807210106.GC17691@grep.be> <[🔎] 20030811200630.GK12770@deadbeast.net> <[🔎] 20030811202233.GC19792@doc.ic.ac.uk>

Andrew Suffield <asuffield@debian.org> wrote:

> Why people think that this group is _not_ representative of the
> project's collective opinion on legal matters is beyond me...

Maybe some people think debian-legal participants were delegated by the
DPL.  :-)

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
  - From: Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org>

References:
- A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
  - From: Wouter Verhelst <wouter@grep.be>
- Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
  - From: Andrew Suffield <asuffield@debian.org>
- Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
  - From: Wouter Verhelst <wouter@grep.be>
- Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
  - From: Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org>
- Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
  - From: Andrew Suffield <asuffield@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: APSL 2.0
Next by Date: Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Previous by thread: Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Next by thread: Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread