Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Fedor Zuev <Fedor_zuev@mail.ru> wrote:
> Of course, you can claim that the very special definition of
> "software" should and will be used for the sole purpose of the
> interpretation of DFSG and Social Contract. [...]
Yes! We use that very special definition listed in dictionaries and
understood by many people here! (Nick Phillips, for example, in
http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2003/debian-legal-200308/msg00247.html
)
Or when you agree with the DFSG, are you using your own special dictionary?
[...]
> AD>How Debian choses to apply its principals of freedom and to what works
> AD>it choses to apply them has NO RELATION to what will land you in jail,
> AD>NO RELATION to what is legal
> You can not ignore the existence of a laws even if you will
> try twice as hard.
Please explain how your local laws giving you more rights over a copyright
text means that the DFSG should not still be satisfied.
And ditch the supercite, please.
--
MJR/slef My Opinion Only and possibly not of any group I know.
http://mjr.towers.org.uk/ jabber://slef@jabber.at
Reply to: